Was it the reactor design that was flawed, or was it the fact that the berms were built a few feet to low to handle the height of the tsunami?
I agree, Art, that Japan will reverse this nuclear policy. The failure of an obsolete nuclear plant in a sunami zone with the standby generators in the basement and the spent fuel rods on the roof is scant reason for permanently giving up on nuclear. But the policy is certainly supportive for LNG now.
Sleuth - That the design of many reactors around the world have emergency generator systems in areas subject to flooding is a problem. Recall the concern of the Nebraskan nuke (Ft Calhoun) that was threatened by the Missouri in flodding last year after it had a fire shut down on of its cooling system.. Had the levy around the plant failed... Then there are the cases when the gensets are called upon they haven't worked. Or nukes like San Onofre built on or very near a major geologic fault.
There are new conventionally fueled designs that, due to the design of their core have a passive emergency cooling system which does not rely on pumps and generators. Significant improvement. Other reactor approaches like pebble bed reactors where by the nature of the fuel construction a core meltdown is not possible. Significant improvement. Others reading this board I'm sure know of companies promoting inherently "safe" nuclear power designs. The point being nuclear can be safe, but it takes a level of awareness and attention people generally don't have.
Bringing this back to IOC, the safety record of this company in a very dangerous business is remarkable. I'm not sure how they do it, but their focus on safety should be a matter of great pride. People working for TEP for whatever reason lost that pride, became complacent and a couple of unexpected events created the catastrophe.
'ValueSleuth' pid='9739' datel Wrote:
'ArtM72' pid='9733' datel Wrote:I'm sorry, but even as a strong proponent of NG I just can't see abandonment of nuclear by Japan for long. I have the unsubstantiated faith that the Japanese people will be brought to understand the hazards of different kinds of nuke design and adopt a design from those whose risk is "deminimus" when compared to the reactors at Fukashima. The biggest problem with nuclear after all is said and done is that its hazards are invisible and humankind is susceptable to being lulled into complacency. Not a minor defect in us, to be sure.
Was it the reactor design that was flawed, or was it the fact that the berms were built a few feet to low to handle the height of the tsunami?
VS
There was a JP report done on the Fukashima disater. If you read it - you will understand a lot more about reduncies and how they can fail and fall like a row of dominos. Several pages outlined that after two days, the emergency crews cell phones and communcations devices went silent, due to the lack of recharge cabability. Batteries ran out.
100 men stayed in place to due what ever the could. Why.. because they all knew their families, their village, their relatives, their nation, their future, their ancesters, were in danger. No Japanees man would run away from that. They would have run to punch the face of horror to save those, than face the shame of failure.
Some here have experienced close family loss due to that horrific event.
Fukashima is a very deep wound in Japanees society.
Tusker
Japan is sticking by no nuke policy for now. Plan is to phase it out by 2040. Will be interesting to see if business/industry gets it reversed now or under future administration. Most likely I would guess but for IOC it's good. Japan says they will move to more LNG and renewables. That means 90% LNG.
Japan to phase out nuclear power by 2040
Updated 14 September 2012, 23:43 AEST
Japan has announced it will phase out nuclear power over the next three decades, in the wake of mounting resistance to the energy source after last year's Fukushima disaster.
Tokyo plans to permanently shut down its reactors by 2040, bringing the country in line with Italy, Switzerland and Germany, which has said it will wean itself off nuclear power by 2022
"The government will introduce every possible policy resource that would enable nuclear power generation to be at zero during the 2030s," said a government paper released Friday.
"Many Japanese hope to build a society that does not rely on nuclear power generation,
"On the other hand, it is also clear that opinions are divided over how soon or exactly how such a society can be achieved."
Since the Fukushima Daiichi plant meltdowns last year, Japan has seen regular vocal protests against nuclear power, sometimes attracting tens of thousands of people at a time.
The new policy goal is seen to be a response to this public pressure.
But the plan is not binding on any future government, and a new administration could reverse the plan if elected in general polls this autumn.
Impractical plan?
The new energy policy calls for shutting down reactors more than 40-years-old, not building any new nuclear reactors and only restarting existing reactors if they pass standards issued by a new regulatory agency.
Japan's powerful business lobby is pushing for the restart of shuttered factors, fearing power shortages and soaring utility bills.
The chairman of the Keidanren, or Japan Business Federation, Hiromasa Yonekura, is one of many critics who argue the phasing out nuclear power is not practical.
"There is no way we can accept this. I cannot think this is technologically possible," he said.
The head of major utility Kansai Electric Power, Makoto Yagi, worries the government did not seek out enough feedback from the public.
"I am not sure whether substantial national discussions were held on this issue," he said.
Japan has been heavily dependent on oil from the Middle East and foreign imports since 2011's nuclear disaster.
In the months following the meltdown, all of Japan's working reactors were shut down for routine safety checks, but only two of them have been restarted since.
Moving toward renewable energy
Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has recommended the country make greater use of renewable energy, and take further energy saving measures.
It also said Japan should develop resources in nearby waters and look to cheaper procurement of liquefied natural gas and other fossil fuels.
This was a sentiment echoed by Greenpeace, who "cautiously welcomed" the new policy.
"The government and energy utilities must make every effort to rapidly phase out nuclear power and deploy renewable solutions to avoid future disasters," it said in a statement.
The environmental group said Japan should use its zero-nuclear goal as a starting point and make "increasingly bold strides towards the sustainable green economy that will secure Japan's future prosperity".
But the organisation has questioned Tokyo's decades-long timeline to phase out nuclear power since all but two reactors in the nation have already been switched off.
- ABC/AFP