![]() |
|
OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported (/showthread.php?tid=6062) |
OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - Tree - 02-27-2014
RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - Putncalls - 02-27-2014 Tree If OSH ended up with PAC LNG's share does that mean that IOC only has 7% of E/A? RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - Tree - 02-27-2014
'Putncalls' pid='38102' datel Wrote:Tree If OSH ended up with PAC LNG's share does that mean that IOC only has 7% of E/A? No. This OSH % is a gross % as was PAC LNG/IPI, prior to Gov't opt in. Gov't 22.5% stake will come from the 3 now existing partners, TOT, IOC and OSH. The way to view this is owership after Gov't buy in. Stated material stakes should be: TOT 32.5% IOC 30% Gov't 22.5% This leaves 15% for net for OSH, or their may be more sell-downs by OSH, IOC or TOT.
RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - ebster123 - 02-27-2014 There was much talk about the gas but this about liquids was interesting: "“Oil Search estimates presently that gross Elk/Antelope best estimate contingent resources are 5.3 trillion cubic feet of raw gas including 75 million barrels of associated liquids,” the company said in a statement to the Australia Securities Exchange." RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - jft310 - 02-27-2014 Tree-show the board how you computed 15 percent as the OSH number.thks RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - Tree - 02-27-2014
'jft310' pid='38108' datel Wrote: I thought I did. 32.5 + 30 + 22.5 = 85%, leaves 15% for OSH at this point, assuming Gov't opts in for 22.5%. Remember, as owners of the PRL 15 prior to Gov't opt in, IOC, TOT and OSH stakes will be reduced proportionately to make up the Gov't stake. Gov't will pat back in costs to these partners as well. Could be Gov't opts in for less than 22.5% also. We will see soon, like a couple weeks. Jim, please do not share your tan lines with the board.
RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - sltibbs - 02-27-2014 Tree, Sorry, but I am missing something. How do you get TOT at 32.5% net instead of 47.5%? Also, how do you get OSH at 15% if it shows they bought 22.8% gross, which is 17.7% net (22.8%*(1-22.5%))? Thanks. Best, Sam RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - jft310 - 02-27-2014 So using SAMs number we can see a value of just E/A of $5 Billionish. RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - ArtM72 - 02-27-2014
'Putncalls' pid='38102' dateline='<a href="tel:1393486 Wrote:Tree If OSH ended up with PAC LNG's share does that mean that IOC only has 7% of E/A? sure looks that way to me. Another damn case of bad PR. Market opens and shitstorm returns I fear. Unbelievable. RE: OSH/PacLNG Deal Details Reported - cybersssss - 02-27-2014 Just a quick calculation, but based upon what Oil Search is paying PacLNG , my calculation is 3.1 billion based on 900 million for 23% of E/A. 3.1 billion is IOC's portion of E/A prior to sell down. This does not include upside from additional gas found over 7 TCF. |