'ArtM72' pid='69376' datel Wrote:-Having sat on a public corporation board before is now IOC's measure of competence? -That one has been a business associate of Mulacek with actual interest in Bobcat, Raptor and 3tops is reason enough for dismissal? -Modular and floating LNG are failed technologies? -That the present IOC board or management can take any credit for R, B or T discoveries, a continued appraisal program or any public plan for execution by other than Total? I could certainly continue, but the real message behind this ad hominem attack on Phil is "we hope Total doesn't delay further or this world class gravy train will come to an end." Palm, JFT, you guys think this IOC's evaluation of PM board nominees was a good one? Let's see how long MH and board lets the MS "update" stand without substantive correction.

I might add to your list that Hession has packed the BOD and executive management of IOC with Woodside/Woodside allied people, but the really pertinent point would be to compare the number of shares Mr. Mulacek owns with that of Hession and the rest of the current BOD.  This would go a long way in explaining Mr. Mulacek's motivation.

'Palm' pid='69369' dateline='<a href="tel:1463481 Wrote:A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

'jft310' pid='69404' datel Wrote:

'Palm' pid='69369' dateline='<a href="tel:1463481 Wrote:A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

While you're at it, you might also suggest that those voting against Phil should read Cyber's thread, Concerned Interoil Shareholders proxy circular.

jft310 dateline='<a href="tel:1463507120">1463507120</a>' Wrote:

Palm dateline='<a href="tel:1463481816">1463481816</a>' Wrote: A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

have to say it - anyone voting against Phil hasn't looked at the share price and MH/Board compensation - almost a perfect negative correlation!

inconvenient reality which started long before the oil price fall.

(05-19-2016, 06:59 AM)Indoreservoir Wrote:

jft310 dateline='<a href="tel:1463507120">1463507120</a>' Wrote:

Palm dateline='<a href="tel:1463481816">1463481816</a>' Wrote: A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

have to say it - anyone voting against Phil hasn't looked at the share price and MH/Board compensation - almost a perfect negative correlation!

inconvenient reality which started long before the oil price fall.

And the incompetent pink shirt board can't even get the oil price right in the 2016 MIC (look at the ye 2014 and 2015 prices on page 57). One has to ask how many other errors or outright lies are in the MIC and indeed anything this Board says. The oil price was the only thing I fact checked. How can anyone trust people who are only out for themselves and report incorrect info (or lie) in support of that agenda? I truly wish I was making this up.

Yeah, Indo, perhaps a trip to Grand Rapids and a class or so at Calvin College might help you read data.  Data presented on Page 57 do not purport to be actual prices.  Had you absorbed the heading of the chart, you would have understood how the data had been adjusted to get the comparison.  But it's easy to call people incompetent and liars when most readers won't check the evidence you cite.

katytrader dateline='<a href="tel:1463620354">1463620354</a>' Wrote:

Indoreservoir dateline='<a href="tel:1463605151">1463605151</a>' Wrote:

jft310 dateline='<a href="tel:1463507120">1463507120</a>' Wrote:

Palm dateline='<a href="tel:1463481816">1463481816</a>' Wrote: A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

have to say it - anyone voting against Phil hasn't looked at the share price and MH/Board compensation - almost a perfect negative correlation!

inconvenient reality which started long before the oil price fall.

And the incompetent pink shirt board can't even get the oil price right in the 2016 MIC (look at the ye 2014 and 2015 prices on page 57). One has to ask how many other errors or outright lies are in the MIC and indeed anything this Board says. The oil price was the only thing I fact checked. How can anyone trust people who are only out for themselves and report incorrect info (or lie) in support of that agenda? I truly wish I was making this up.

Yeah, Indo, perhaps a trip to Grand Rapids and a class or so at Calvin College might help you read data.  Data presented on Page 57 do not purport to be actual prices.  Had you absorbed the heading of the chart, you would have understood how the data had been adjusted to get the comparison.  But it's easy to call people incompetent and liars when most readers won't check the evidence you cite.

Suggest you look again - the graph is certainly a ratio comparing value to 1/1/11 (though not labeled as such), but the Table below it clearly has Brent Oil marked as in C$.    And if it was a ratio in the Table normalizing to a 1/1/2011 price, then for YE 2015 the number would be 54.7 (corrected) for Brent crude.

And I didn't say incompetent AND a liar, i said 'or' - oh well

I fly thru Detroit in a couple of weeks - is that near enough to Grand Rapids?

But as suggested by others, I'll pick up something at the airport bookstore to help me - maybe something to calm me down!

Cheers

(05-19-2016, 12:27 PM)Indoreservoir Wrote:

katytrader dateline='<a href="tel:1463620354">1463620354</a>' Wrote:

Indoreservoir dateline='<a href="tel:1463605151">1463605151</a>' Wrote:

jft310 dateline='<a href="tel:1463507120">1463507120</a>' Wrote:

Palm dateline='<a href="tel:1463481816">1463481816</a>' Wrote: A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

have to say it - anyone voting against Phil hasn't looked at the share price and MH/Board compensation - almost a perfect negative correlation!

inconvenient reality which started long before the oil price fall.

And the incompetent pink shirt board can't even get the oil price right in the 2016 MIC (look at the ye 2014 and 2015 prices on page 57). One has to ask how many other errors or outright lies are in the MIC and indeed anything this Board says. The oil price was the only thing I fact checked. How can anyone trust people who are only out for themselves and report incorrect info (or lie) in support of that agenda? I truly wish I was making this up.

Yeah, Indo, perhaps a trip to Grand Rapids and a class or so at Calvin College might help you read data.  Data presented on Page 57 do not purport to be actual prices.  Had you absorbed the heading of the chart, you would have understood how the data had been adjusted to get the comparison.  But it's easy to call people incompetent and liars when most readers won't check the evidence you cite.

Suggest you look again - the graph is certainly a ratio (though not labeled as such), but the Table below it clearly has Brent Oil marked as in C$.    And if it was a ratio in the Table to the 2011 price, for YE 2015 the number would be 46 for Brent crude.

And I didn't say incompetent AND a liar, i said 'or' - oh well

I fly thru Detroit in a couple of weeks - is that near enough to Grand Rapids?

But as suggested by others, I'll pick up something at the airport bookstore to help me - maybe something to calm me down!

Cheers