![]() |
|
O Neill Loves the froggies - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: O Neill Loves the froggies (/showthread.php?tid=10787) |
RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - jft310 - 06-22-2016 PNGLNG was 10,000 workers this Papua is 13,000, Papua had no mountains , no airstrip etc, or itvappears to be plus 3,000 workers for Papua with less stressful land area . RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - AU74 - 06-22-2016 It is absolutely a slur. See the dictionary link (or any other dictionary, I have no doubt) and other links provided. RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - AU74 - 06-22-2016
'jdeo1969' pid='72609' datel Wrote:'AU74' pid='72608' datel Wrote:Calling me names doesn't change my original question. Is the slur necessary?Its not a slur. The world calls us Yanks. I'm not a yankee I am an American, but I'm not offended regardless of what anyone anywhere calls me. Grow up, toughen up and quit being a sissy and either discuss the merits of the post or move along. Nothing about any of stavros' posts have ever struck me as racist or ethnically insensitive, but if they had I wouldnt care because in the end its meaningless and if it bothers you, then you need to grow a pair, or develop thicker skin or perhaps develop a little self esteem that better insulates you from the big bad world. Sticks and stones.
Racist or ethnically bigoted remarks are meaningless? On what planet? RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - jdeo1969 - 06-22-2016 (06-22-2016, 11:43 PM)AU74 Wrote: It is absolutely a slur. See the dictionary link (or any other dictionary, I have no doubt) and other links provided. Who Cares what your virtual dictionary says? In the annals of slurs its the nicest I've ever heard (if you call froggies a slur), so take your purse and move along if this is too much for you. His post has no harmful intent. Quit making it the issue. RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - jdeo1969 - 06-22-2016 (06-22-2016, 11:46 PM)AU74 Wrote: For crying out loud. If you take offense to froggie, my opinion is that you are an overly sensitive human being. that comment is meaner than stavros use of froggie, which you apparently are the only human being I've encountered to be so deeply offended by that term. If you wish to discuss deeply offensive slurs, go do it on another message board. No wonder we always bail you French out. How do you project strength in a world frought with evil when you are so harmed by a jovial term which carries no deep historical reference to something very horrible such as the N word here in the USA. RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - AU74 - 06-22-2016 http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/frog RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - jdeo1969 - 06-22-2016 Take off the skirt. Quit being so sensitive and either discuss the post or don't. RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - AU74 - 06-22-2016 Dictionaries call it derogatory or offensive, you say jovial and think that's a credible response? I'd like to be able to read the great information here without seeing these derogatory slurs. That's all. That's why I asked if it was necessary. That's all. RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - AU74 - 06-23-2016 So what if I was a skirt-wearing male? Would you have some choice slurs for that? RE: O Neill Loves the froggies - Libtardius Maximus - 06-23-2016
'AU74' pid='72619' datel Wrote:So what if I was a skirt-wearing male? Would you have some choice slurs for that?
Yes, Scottish. Is this a slur too? |