Don't really want to give a number publicly.  Let' s just say my retirement will pretty much be fully funded.

'Tusker' pid='21467' datel Wrote:

As with many a contest, one may wish to consider the unveiling of numbers.  Dimension may figure promenetly, such as L~W~H.

As the judges review the beauty contest numbers, I recall an informal survey of voting shareholders occasioned at previous informal AGM meetings.

I would like to ask you all if we can total up the amount of voting share held by members of the InterOil forum. I understand that there are ~ 120 active participants as of the first of this year.

A significant number will bring a dimension of respect for all the participants and contributors whom have taken the time to follow a path less traveled.

May good fortune accompany you all.

Cheers

1) Tusker & 1 other plus significant oth's:

45 K

Good evening / morning to you all and thank you for your participation.

There have been 18 replies to date.  Replies include individuals,family,and friends beyound the 18.

As those two whom included family and friends, I have guessed a addiitonal seven.

This informal survey came to the following total for voting shares of 237,060 shares.

There was no reply to date (privacy concerns are respected) for the other 100 active members, Based on the sample numbers... I believe a extrapolation to extend the total voting shares of individuals on the InterOil Forum to somewhere between 800,000 to 1,000,000 shares has a statistical reliability.

This amount does not represent those shares that are professional administrated by managers.  A near guess for those whom participate on this InterOil Forum would include 400,000.

We are a significant gathering of people who share an interest.  We have this place to learn, exchange ideas and opinions.

May good fortune accompany you all.

Salante

Tusker

'Tusker' pid='21641' dateline='<a href="tel:1367202 Wrote:

'Tusker' pid='21467' dateline='<a href="tel:1366937 Wrote:

As with many a contest, one may wish to consider the unveiling of numbers.  Dimension may figure promenetly, such as L~W~H.

As the judges review the beauty contest numbers, I recall an informal survey of voting shareholders occasioned at previous informal AGM meetings.

I would like to ask you all if we can total up the amount of voting share held by members of the InterOil forum. I understand that there are ~ 120 active participants as of the first of this year.

A significant number will bring a dimension of respect for all the participants and contributors whom have taken the time to follow a path less traveled.

May good fortune accompany you all.

Cheers

1) Tusker & 1 other plus significant oth's:

45 K

Good evening / morning to you all and thank you for your participation.

There have been 18 replies to date.  Replies include individuals,family,and friends beyound the 18.

As those two whom included family and friends, I have guessed a addiitonal seven.

This informal survey came to the following total for voting shares of 237,060 shares.

There was no reply to date (privacy concerns are respected) for the other 100 active members, Based on the sample numbers... I believe a extrapolation to extend the total voting shares of individuals on the InterOil Forum to somewhere between 800,000 to 1,000,000 shares has a statistical reliability.

This amount does not represent those shares that are professional administrated by managers.  A near guess for those whom participate on this InterOil Forum would include 400,000.

We are a significant gathering of people who share an interest.  We have this place to learn, exchange ideas and opinions.

May good fortune accompany you all.

Salante

Tusker

Tusker, to you and to all of the SHU "family" this has been quite and exciting, educational and I hope REWARDING ride.  I appreciate all the candor (both on SHU and off) from the members.  I hope we all get a nice payout soon "NOOS" with additional future compensation but my next hope is that we continue as a forum for additional investments.  My only regret is that Binck is not here.  Thanks to all, T