+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Please vote NO on the Pink Form (/showthread.php?tid=10280)
Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Stavros - 05-20-2016
I don't like the initial deal as it stands right now.
IOC shareholders get 21% ownership of the merged company.
WE SHOULD GET AT LEAST 30%
The CVR payment of $0.77 per tcfe is too low.
TOTAL is making out like a bandit.
Big Boy Pouyanne stepped on both Hession's and Botten's necks. They are saving BILLION$
If the deal is killed by 40+% of IOC shareholders, then we will get more OSH shares and higher CVR payments
That's what we must now work towards TOGETHER.
No in-fighting > > > Shareholders UNITE!
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - jft310 - 05-20-2016
That 66 percent number is a big one . If you have voted you can change your vote
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Stavros - 05-20-2016
There has been no vote for the merger JFT
The FORM will be Pink
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Tusker - 05-20-2016
We all can send a message seen and heard loud and clear with the blue form.
Shareholders UNITE!
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - MartiniStocks9756 - 05-20-2016
Barrons tonight....As a result, Oil Search expects its next debt to fall by $300 million after this deal.
Investors seem to like this deal alright. Oil Search rose 2.8% this morning. Brent crude futures rose 0.5% this morning after falling 0.2% overnight.
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Stavros - 05-20-2016
OSH lowers its debt because THE DEAL SUCKS FOR IOC SHAREHOLDERS
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - ArtM72 - 05-20-2016
'Stavros' pid='69595' datel Wrote:OSH lowers its debt because THE DEAL SUCKS FOR IOC SHAREHOLDERS
OSH would lowers its debt because it would haves MORE than enought gas to cover TOT and XOM obligations and desires. The deal concept isn't bad, just the value offered (so long as MH is gone, without bonus, because deal made would have IOC valued at less than it was when he was hired.
Gotta start phoning the analysts with a coherent strategy. Shareholders Unite!
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Tusker - 05-20-2016
Total Web site:
Mention made that they already notifying market they intent to make future sales to LNG industry based on the acquisition.
Buying the future, selling the future, of IOC Shareholders property. "China Town"
Shareholders Unite!
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - ArtM72 - 05-20-2016
How much will OSH get from TOT for the 60% of IOC which it intends to sell back to the French? That would seem to be a pretty important number.
RE: Please vote NO on the Pink Form - Tusker - 05-20-2016
(05-20-2016, 12:50 PM)ArtM72 Wrote:
(05-20-2016, 12:00 PM)Stavros Wrote: OSH lowers its debt because THE DEAL SUCKS FOR IOC SHAREHOLDERSOSH would lowers its debt because it would haves MORE than enought gas to cover TOT and XOM obligations and desires. The deal concept isn't bad, just the value offered (so long as MH is gone, without bonus, because deal made would have IOC valued at less than it was when he was hired.
Gotta start phoning the analysts with a coherent strategy. Shareholders Unite!
Yes!
OSL would than book the assets based on standard defiintions of FID. OSL would have "reserves" based for three LNG trains.
What is not being disussed is the condensate. OSL desperatly needs to increase its RRR (reserve replacement ratio) forward. So, is it the same deal with XOM? Total gets the gas, OSL gets 10K-30K per day production of condensates?
Ezxon recently complete a 10K production of condensates on the North Slope of Alaska. If 10K of condensate is good for XOM, how great would 30K plus be for OSL in the aquistion of IOC.
No ? mark provided.