+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal (/showthread.php?tid=11014)
I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - Stavros - 07-21-2016
The Oil Search Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h was NOT ACCEPTABLE.
The ExxonMobil Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h is NOT ACCEPTABLE either.
NOT EVEN CLOSE
I will again vote NO to this current XOM Proposal
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - Putncalls - 07-21-2016
There still might be a yes vote for OSH. Their 8 shares are worth more than 45$
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - Kaliboo - 07-21-2016
'Stavros' pid='74455' datel Wrote:The Oil Search Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h was NOT ACCEPTABLE.
The ExxonMobil Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h is NOT ACCEPTABLE either.
NOT EVEN CLOSE
I will again vote NO to this current XOM Proposal
I'm thinking the same thing. Offer is still crap with a drop of perfume added.
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - Palm - 07-21-2016
OSH offer just got vaporized. There will be no vote on the 28th. Exxon deal is now on the table.
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - Tusker - 07-21-2016
So... why go to NYC ?
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - ArtM72 - 07-21-2016
'Tusker' pid='74478' datel Wrote:So... why go to NYC ?
Waste more of our money.
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - jft310 - 07-21-2016
Vote no means a possible future gain.
RE: I will vote NO to the ExxonMobil Proposal - CAC - 07-21-2016
'Stavros' pid='74455' dateline='<a href="tel:1469062 Wrote:The Oil Search Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h was NOT ACCEPTABLE.
The ExxonMobil Proposal to acquire IOC for shares + ca$h is NOT ACCEPTABLE either.
NOT EVEN CLOSE
I will again vote NO to this current XOM Proposal
*******
I think XOM wants to pay IOC for 7T's after A7 and then keep IOC's right to the future re-cert numbers that may eventually show 10T's. TOT will pay them and not us. IOC shareholders lose out on that money with what consideration? Hession should counter with a deal structure that protects what is already an existing right/asset, rather than just "recommending approval" to whatever he can get.