+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf (/showthread.php?tid=11064)
Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - davidhmtk - 07-26-2016
Exxon believed E/A was at least 8tcf before A4, A5, A7
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - jft310 - 07-26-2016
The scum bags assumed a water drive vs a gas deletion drive which greatly reduced the volumn of gas that was certified . That water drive assumption came from OSH. That's crook defined therefore Hession go work for the crooks you fit right in ,
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - sageo - 07-26-2016
'davidhmtk' pid='74861' datel Wrote:Exxon believed E/A was at least 8tcf before A4, A5, A7
David - A pleasant am to you. As I stated on another thread recently, any amount under $95 ps that Exxon (or any other company) gets our assets for, will make a lot of money in the ensuing 25 to 35 years .....(probably zillions ) . " border="0" class="smilie" src="http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/images/smilies/cool.gif" /> Best to you and yours .
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - Stavros - 07-27-2016
'jft310' pid='74863' datel Wrote:The scum bags assumed a water drive vs a gas deletion drive which greatly reduced the volumn of gas that was certified . That water drive assumption came from OSH. That's crook defined therefore Hession go work for the crooks you fit right in ,
The Poofter must go
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - jft310 - 07-27-2016
'Stavros' pid='74870' dateline='<a href="tel:1469541 Wrote:
'jft310' pid='74863' dateline='<a href="tel:1469539 Wrote:The scum bags assumed a water drive vs a gas depletion drive which greatly reduced the volumn of gas that was certified . That water drive assumption came from OSH. That's crook defined therefore Hession go work for the crooks you fit right in ,The Poofter must go
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - ArtM72 - 07-27-2016
I maintain that if Total had any worres about sufficient gas to run two trains they would have sunk a well into Antelope South to look for more. Total knows there is plenty of gas in IOC acreage to feed more than 2 trains. Possibly many more. That is why Total will be back for more bidding. They want to be a player in the Asian Pacific LNG market and acquiring IOC has the potential to make them the dominant player.
Phil has waived the white flag with very reasonable terms based upon the E/A reservoir alone. There is little doubt in my mind that if Exxon meets either of Phils alternative payment models they will be assured of a positive stockholder vote. Whether Total will be there at that time to compete is anybody's guess. My guess is there will be at least one more round of bidding .
RE: Phil - Exxon confident more than 10tcf - jft310 - 07-27-2016
Art
Good stuff
Thanks
My add-Total has billions of reasons to compete . Can wait till the very last moment . Oil prices dropping and all