![]() |
|
DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning (/showthread.php?tid=1275) |
DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Petrovale - 08-07-2012
O’Neill warns of cuts RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Justin94360 - 08-07-2012 Very positive, making the agenda about public service instead of self interest. RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Spartina - 08-07-2012 'He said the LNG project promised a lot for the people, but there were dangers of missed opportunities." I think he may be talking about the gulf project here... To clarify - Missed opportunity portion of the statement regarding the gulf project's delay and Duma's part in that. RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - ValueSleuth - 08-07-2012 “We have spent billions of kina in education and health, but we are not making a difference. There is something wrong. That is why I am asking for the extra effort.” The above statement is what O'Neill was really concerned about -- the failure of the bureaucracy to deliver on education and health distribution to the people. I don't think his statement had much to do with "missed opportunities" related to the PNG LNG development project. The bureaucracy didn't screw up the PNG government's financing deal on their portion of the PNG LNG project. That was done by Arthur Somare, with little consultation with anybody, based on what I think I've read. VS RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Getitrt2 - 08-08-2012 Petrovale, "DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning": Where are you getting this?....your opinion reading between the lines? RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - Petrovale - 08-08-2012
(08-08-2012, 06:17 AM)Getitrt2 Wrote: your opinion reading between the lines? Absolutely, I like to put my conclusion in the title of my post, so you can make up your mind whether or not to read the whole article... Apart from the fact that Duma has effectively delayed the Gulf project, he didn't pay DPE's bills and basically closed down the office, including phone lines and website. PNG needs money, the government bureaucracy is a mess and many bureaucrats like to have a free lunch. If O'Neill is truly committed to a Sovereign Wealth Fund kind of philosophy, he must thoroughly reorganize PNG's key ministries and related state enterprises. Treasury and Planning should rule; the other buggers should follow. So, if O'Neill choses to reassign Duma, which I would find a stupid decision, I expect the PM to reign in this zebra minister, reorganize DPE / Petromin, and subordinate these agencies to higher powers. Let business do its business. Best, Petro RE: DPE to be abolished or restrained by Natl Planning - ValueSleuth - 08-08-2012
'Petrovale' pid='7799' datel Wrote: Petrovale, I like the thrust of your statements, and it would be fantastic if he could do this from the get-go. Unfortunately, I suspect he'll not be that radical to start with, and that may dim the possibility that your end result could be achieved. I'm rooting for your outcome and agree that it would be a very bad move (and bad sign) to reappoint Duma to DPE Minister or the equivalent. We'll probably know a lot and can read the tea leaves by tomorrow. VS |