Our own introduction article..

'admin' pid='8721' datel Wrote:They've been around and have an established product, the proceeds of which finances the Clipstream G2 development, so I don't share your worries, but agree it might not be for everyone.

STP, do you have any numbers in mind for what the upside would be if Clipstream G2 is a big success?  A bluesky sort of guess.

'admin' pid='8747' datel Wrote:Well, if you read the latest CC, not even the CEO could be drawn into such discussion. I'm pretty sure that the advantages are compelling for a substantial amount of potential users, who can do away with streaming servers, content distribution companies, and trans-coding, while achieving near 100% of targeted audience. There might be some minor trade-offs in terms of CPU and battery use (could be a little higher compared to devices which use a H264 chip, but then again, this is only for mobile devices and few watch feature length movies on their mobiles, and soon we'll move to h.265 which these old chips don't play), but for most of the targeted users, the advantages far outweigh these. Compare that to the (now) $50M market cap, and I think it is a rather compelling proposition.

But for tech illiterates.... doesn't all that translate into barrels of oil or mmcf of gas? : -)

'admin' pid='8749' datel Wrote:I suppose in the end it does. They solve problems and cost for a substantial amount of users, just like one of my other favorite stocks (ELLI) does. It's early days and it remains to be seen how many of these users will be lining up and what they're willing to pay. But for a $50M market cap company which already has another profitable product, I think it is a rather compelling proposition.

My take, as one who relies on his grandkids for tech support, is that it's a real good bet.  Probably a lot better bet than many of the junior oil cos I throw money at.