ShareholdersUnite Forums
Woodside eyeing PNG - Printable Version

+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Woodside eyeing PNG (/showthread.php?tid=2119)



Woodside eyeing PNG - Palm - 11-27-2012

Woodside looks and likes:

"Woodside Petroleum WPL.AU -0.41% CEO Peter Coleman has shown a liking for pushing the Australian oil producer offshore in recent months–but has contrasting views of two of the world’s energy hotspots.
Papua New Guinea’s potential as an exporter of large volumes of natural gas to Asia  means the Southeast Asian country is firmly on the company’s radar for expansion, but East Africa is off limits to Woodside for the time being despite a series of world-class gas discoveries there.
Woodside is scouring the world for opportunities after a large hole opened up in its production profile following the successful start-up of its 14.9 billion Australian dollar (US$15.6 billion) Pluto liquefied natural gas project in Western Australia state. A disappointing exploration campaign nearby has stymied hopes of adding another processing train there.
While it expects to be in a position to decide whether to begin construction of the Browse LNG project in Western Australia by the middle of next year, it would be several years before gas is produced for sale. Analysts think Woodside’s production profile will be virtually flat until at least 2018 unless it makes a big splash offshore through acquisitions or makes a significant oil and gas discovery that can be developed quickly.
So far, Woodside has announced it’s part of a joint venture bidding for offshore exploration blocks near the small Mediterranean nation of Cyprus and expects a decision within weeks.  It’s also in the early phase of bidding for a stake in the giant Leviathan field offshore Israel, which is estimated to hold about 17 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and a further 600 million barrels of oil.
The only concrete success in Mr. Coleman’s overseas growth strategy so far has been the acquisition of a 40% stake in an offshore oil and gas exploration block in Myanmar, as the Southeast Asian nation slowly opens up to Western investment following the roll-back of international sanctions.
Mr. Coleman says Papua New Guinea remains part of Woodside’s global screening process, which looks at the size of resources and the ability to add value to existing joint venture owners. Papua New Guinea has an estimated 26 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, which could be developed for export to Asia, while much of the country is lightly explored.
Woodside won’t discuss specific assets in PNG, Mr. Coleman says.
However, at least two companies with discovered natural gas resources in Papua New Guinea are seeking to bring in a new investor by selling assets. Texas-based InterOil said Nov. 16 it expects to agree the sale of part of its interest in two fields and its Gulf LNG project in Papua New Guinea within weeks, while Horizon Oil last week said several large companies in the LNG industry have shown interest in the partial selldown of its natural gas assets there.
Mr. Coleman says Asia and the Mediterranean also feature in its screening of assets. But East Africa isn’t a priority for the company, despite the discovery of 100 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Mozambique and Tanzania, and estimates by U.K.-based consultancy Wood Mackenzie that as much as 95 trillion cubic feet of gas remains to be found.
“We think East Africa is closed for a while,” Mr. Coleman says.
Woodside watches with interest what is happening in East Africa because of its potential impact on regional LNG sales from 2020, but “the reality is, from an ability to enter into East Africa these days, it is just too expensive,” he says.
Mr. Coleman contrasts competition in East Africa with Woodside’s recent purchase of a stake in an oil and gas exploration block offshore Myanmar.
Woodside sees itself as a first mover in Myanmar where “the rocks are first class”, he says. The country has a mature onshore sector and is looking at opening up offshore in the next couple of years.
“We want to be well positioned to be part of that,” he says. “But you start with the rocks, and the geology there is very interesting to us.”
Turning to the the U.S., Mr. Coleman said the company retains an interest in the “mature” Gulf of Mexico region, despite tighter drilling regulations.
The company is now drilling its first well there since U.S. authorities lifted a moratorium on drilling following the explosion in 2010 of the Deepwater Horizon rig, operated by BP.
“And we’ve got a drilling program that will continue through next year,” he said. “But I think we’re like everybody – we’re continuing to look to see: ‘Can we actually grow in the Gulf of Mexico and, if we do, at what pace? The jury is still out for us on that.”
http://blogs.wsj.com/dealjournalaustralia/2012/11/27/woodside-likes-png-cool-on-east-africa-hotspot/?mod=yahoo_hs



RE: Woodside eyeing PNG - Tree - 11-27-2012

Most intwesting Duckside.  Woodside just may be on the prowl, if not alone, perhaps in a JV with an established partner.   You know it's bad in Australia when Woodside JV Browse LNG is considering a Shell 4 Mtpa? FLNG over a land-based 12 Mtpa expanded to 25 Mtpa facility.

**********

 27 November 2012 10:46 GMT

The head of Shell’s Australian operations has dismissed claims from the West Australian Premier that floating liquefied natural gas technology is unsafe.

WA Premier Colin Barnett was quoted in local media on Tuesday as saying he believed the environmental risks with FLNG were higher than piping offshore production to onshore infrastructure.

“I don’t think it is safe environmentally to have such a massive offshore production and storage facility for gas and oil,” he was quoted as saying in The West Australian newspaper.

“Hopefully, it never will but accidents do happen, like the Gulf of Mexico and also Montara.”

Barnett’s comments were dismissed however by the head of Shell Australia, Ann Pickard.

"It's designed around safety, safety is absolutely paramount, protecting the environment, protecting the people is absolutely paramount in the design, so obviously I disagree," she was quoted as saying by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).

"Everything we do is focused on prevention to make sure we can stop anything happening, it's all about prevention.

"If the risks thing happens then we've got the cap so I don't see a Macondo or Montara happening.

"You can't ever say never but we sure are focusing on the prevention side."

Shell is building a FLNG development at the Prelude field off Western Australia where it is considered its distance from shore makes it economically unviable to build a pipeline.

However, the company is also believed to be pushing for FLNG to be considered as an alternative for the Woodside-led Browse LNG development.

Woodside is currently planning to build LNG processing facilities at James Price Point north of Broome in Western Australia’s remote Kimberly region.

The development would see the construction of a three-train facility at James Price Point, with an initial capacity of 12 million tpa, which will be expandable to 25 million tpa through additional trains.

The Australian company and its joint venture partners, which include Shell, are scheduled to make a final investment decision on the project in the first half of next year.

However the current plan has been plagued by environmental, cost and schedule concerns and it is believed the joint venture partners could consider a FLNG development instead.

Pickard played down this theory however, saying an onshore development was still the preferred development option at Browse.

"Woodside simply has to comply with the retention lease terms so it's James Price Point for Browse right now," the ABC quoted her as saying.

"I think floating is an option for just about anything offshore Australia given the cost structure, so I think floating is potentially the saviour of Australia in future LNG."

The Browse project will be fed by production from the Torosa, Brecknock, Calliance fields, off Western Australia, which are estimated to hold contingent resources of 15.5 trillion cubic feet of dry gas and 417 million barrels of condensate.




RE: Woodside eyeing PNG - Palm - 11-27-2012

Tree-woodie, have to wonder how happy Woodside is with its equity partner Shell. Remember a couple of years ago when Shell boinked Woodside by selling a huge chunk of its shares after saying it woodn't. Woodn't that be interesting if Woodside made a play for IOC backed by Shell clams?