![]() |
|
Antelope-3 Log Results - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Antelope-3 Log Results (/showthread.php?tid=2779) Pages:
1
2
|
Antelope-3 Log Results - Gator - 02-13-2013 Page 15 & 16
Elk-3 well spud preparations File is too big to attach ad PDF RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - Gator - 02-13-2013 Near term corporate goals: Enter into an agreement with an LNG partner including a sale of interest in the Elk and Antelope resource File an application for a PRL (Petroleum Retention License) for Triceratops Development Ramp up to two rig drilling program at Elk and Antelope and PPL237 with PRE. Continue LNG pre-investment to drive the development timeline and reduce EPC contractor and strategic LNG partner bid risks Generate positive EBITDA from our operating businesses PNG Cabinet Approved InterOil’s Gulf LNG Project The InterOil Board of Directors has empowered management and advisors to swiftly bring forth the best transaction to maximize value for our shareholders InterOil, and the partner we select, plan to form a Joint Venture which will be aligned to bring an LNG processing facility to Papua New Guinea of a nature and in a manner which will be satisfactory to the State With the incoming partner, the Joint Venture intends to finalize the development plan for the Gulf LNG project and complete the proper documentation to move the Gulf LNG project forward. The Gas Agreement with the PNG State, which superseeds our 2009 Project Agreement and controls the project development, should be finalized with the LNG partner we select. RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - ArtM72 - 02-13-2013 Didn't see anything said about the development of the fish fields in the near term corporate goals. I presume that was an oversight. I did notice this: "an initial resource estimate of the Triceratops field will be included in our 2012 YE resource estimate. " RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - TxPm - 02-13-2013 Not near as much new info as I was hoping for. I do like a few things 1) continued sense of urgency in completing the SD which is mentioned throughout the presentation 2) Triceratops will be included in the 2011 resource estinates & company mentions several times estimate should increase 3) increased future drilling plan being actively discussed with PRE & DPE for Triceratops 3) A3 results looks good and appear to have removed doubt in the minds of at least one bidder RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - Ass0ciatedPress - 02-14-2013
'TxPm' pid='17319' datel Wrote:Not near as much new info as I was hoping for. I do like a few things 1) continued sense of urgency in completing the SD which is mentioned throughout the presentation 2) Triceratops will be included in the 2011 resource estinates & company mentions several times estimate should increase 3) increased future drilling plan being actively discussed with PRE & DPE for Triceratops 3) A3 results looks good and appear to have removed doubt in the minds of at least one bidder
Agreed TX. I only hope the real focus is on evaluating bids and choosing the right partner as that should be the number one factor right now. Let all the other chips fall as they may. RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - ArtM72 - 02-14-2013 I was surprised no questions at the end of the presentation. Also, I was interested to hear they have applied for and received positive government feedback for modifying drilling schedule requirements for the fish fields. It makes some sense from the PNG standpoint...they can only grow the LNG business so fast and completing E/A and delineating 3tops should more than satisfy the needs of the government for local employment and intermediate term cash flow. RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - Palm - 02-14-2013 Do like this statement on slide 22 which confirms what we've heard: "Although in the early stages of appraisal, an initial resource estimate of the Triceratops field will be included in our 2012 YE resource estimate." And also this on slide 37: "Ramp up to two rig drilling program at Elk and Antelope and PPL237 with PRE." I believe this means 2 rigs at EA and 2 at PRE, which also confirms what has been heard. RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - Tusker - 02-14-2013
'Palm' pid='17332' datel Wrote:Do like this statement on slide 22 which confirms what we've heard: "Although in the early stages of appraisal, an initial resource estimate of the Triceratops field will be included in our 2012 YE resource estimate." And also this on slide 37: "Ramp up to two rig drilling program at Elk and Antelope and PPL237 with PRE." I believe this means 2 rigs at EA and 2 at PRE, which also confirms what has been heard. Yes... there has been a shift of devolpment stratagy. I mentioned to one of you yesterday that I was wondering why we were not getting any movement on the ground for Rig 2 & 3. Could it be that these rigs were in play with a partner? Hmmmm Ok... is the sell down of E/A to the same partner that will join the Gulf LNG Project? If so, this enity is building a vetical position in partnership with IOC. A profit maker at each step of the production. Also, not moving the rigs from E/A at this time means a acceleration of field develpment in front of ground breaking at the bluff. Can Rig#3 due multi-directional drilling? Nice advantage to exploite in field resource enginnering.. Now, how about the pipeline link from E/A to B/T? More acceleration to bring larger quaities of gas for toot,toot and a toot of another name ? PNG O'Neil and Duma want this project off the desk and on the ground. Kavo I expect is working hard to get the Gulf Province ready. Interesting morning. Cheers
RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - ArtM72 - 02-14-2013 Tucker - I'm sure you noticed it but page 18 of today's presentation shows a raw gas line going from B/T to E/A's CSP. RE: Antelope-3 Log Results - admin - 02-14-2013 I'm quite curious what GLJ will assign to T2. They haven't really hit the sweet spot there yet, but the column at T2 is large and so is the field, and then there are these liquids at the bottom. The P90 and P50 numbers will not be large, but the P10 number could be, which would give the upward potential. Any takers here? |