![]() |
|
XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To (/showthread.php?tid=3827) |
XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Tree - 06-05-2013
RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - bam - 06-05-2013 The implication that the Gaffney resource estimate is over 8.5tcf would appear to be a large problem for the short thesis here. RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-05-2013 Hohoho. Looks like Byker convinced XOM that too much misinformation was being cast about and there needed to be some clarification. Good find Skidaddy! RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Spartina - 06-05-2013 Oh gentlemen, great stuff. RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Tree - 06-05-2013
'Palm' pid='23796' datel Wrote:Hohoho. Looks like Byker convinced XOM that too much misinformation was being cast about and there needed to be some clarification. Good find Skidaddy! Short's were making XOM out to be the public fool for grabbing IOC gas which isn't there!! Not smart to diss XOM. Wagging the gorilla is OK if done in a respectful manner. RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - TomCrooz - 06-05-2013 This extra info on first press release would have been most appreciated. As they say in the commercial with the little kids....more is better RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-05-2013 Per management they said what the attorneys for IOC and XOM allowed them to say and at that moment XOM attorneys ruled. RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - charleydavid - 06-05-2013 Can you help me understand how Byker can stand in front of a microphone of a PNG paper and say that there are 'major terms' but not be allowed to reveal the details of the transaction. If the CA that they have is so strong then what the heck is he doing answering any questions... why not 'I am not at liberty to discuss' once again i think this is material and the company needs to end the speculation and commit to concrete details... RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-06-2013 Unless you or I have read the CAs themselves we can "demand" this or that all we want and it won't change what Byker or others can say based on what the attorneys allow them to say. What you or I "think" is immaterial. I know this; IOC management wanted to disclose more in the original PR, but were advised they could not. I can beller all I want about that and it won't chnage what they will say. Obviously Byker was granted permission to put some color on what is being negotiated but with strict limitations on details. Again, he MUST abide by legal direction from both sides; IOC and Exxon. Exxon must have agreed that some material inaccuracies were being spewed about in the press and blessed Byker making the statements he did. Byker and others inside will NOT risk a great deal by saying things people on a message board feel should be disclosed. That's why you as a shareholder (presumably) have the right to use or flush, buy and sell, etc. We will get what we will get until all is finalized. Like it or not. RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - ltinvest - 06-06-2013 "once again i think this is material and the company needs to end the speculation and commit to concrete details..." We would all like to know the "concrete" details. However, at this point, only a terms sheet has been signed by both parties. They are close enough that Interoil was able to pick Exxon as the "winning bidder" and enter exclusive negotiations. Thus, the material event as declared by counsel. But negotiations continue and the next announcement will be the final terms in a signed agreement. |