ShareholdersUnite Forums
XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Printable Version

+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To (/showthread.php?tid=3827)

Pages: 1 2 3


XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Tree - 06-05-2013

Exxon eyes 4.6Tcf: exclusive


WITH exclusive negotiations underway, InterOil says ExxonMobil is seeking 4.6 trillion cubic feet of gas from its Elk-Antelope discoveries to fuel a third train expansion of the PNG LNG project.

While there is a lot of time left within the 60-day exclusive negotiations period announced on May 24, InterOil interim chief executive officer Dr Gaylen Byker told PNGIndustryNews.net that “major terms” had already been agreed to. 

Asked whether three more wells would need to be drilled into the field to re-certify its resource, Byker revealed there was already enough gas for a PNG LNG expansion.

“ExxonMobil PNG is proposing that 4.6Tcf of gas from the Elk-Antelope field is used to underpin the construction of an additional train at the PNG LNG project site,” he said. 

“This is not contingent on re-certification of the Elk/Antelope resource.”

As of late 2012, GLJ Petroleum Consultant’s figures for the field included a best case estimate of 9.07Tcf of initial recoverable sales gas and 135.4 million barrels of initial recoverable condensate. 

The Papua New Guinean government is using separate estimates from Gaffney, Cline and Associates. 

While they aren’t publicly known Byker indicated they were strong enough to potentially double PNG LNG’s capacity from its under-construction, two-train plant.

“The Gaffney, Cline and Associates estimates are sufficient to underpin two LNG trains,” Byker told PNGIndustryNews.net. 

About three-quarters of the Exxon-led PNG LNG joint venture’s 292km onshore gas pipeline was completed by February but there could be more pipeline welding work ahead. 

Byker said the Elk-Antelope field was about 90-100km from the coast, with the PNG LNG pipeline just offshore. 

Exxon is negotiating with InterOil and its partner Pacific LNG for a stake of the Elk-Antelope-hosting petroleum retention licence 15.

The goal is to conclude a sales and purchase agreement, with Exxon succeeding in the prior bidding process which included offers from other supermajors and national oil companies. 

PNG LNG is on track for first exports next year. 

A third train expansion may lift capacity from 6.9 million tonnes per annum to 10.35Mtpa, based on the existing plant designs.




RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - bam - 06-05-2013

The implication that the Gaffney resource estimate is over 8.5tcf would appear to be a large problem for the short thesis here.




RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-05-2013

Hohoho. Looks like Byker convinced XOM that too much misinformation was being cast about and there needed to be some clarification. Good find Skidaddy!


RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Spartina - 06-05-2013

Oh gentlemen, great stuff.


RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Tree - 06-05-2013

'Palm' pid='23796' datel Wrote:Hohoho. Looks like Byker convinced XOM that too much misinformation was being cast about and there needed to be some clarification. Good find Skidaddy!

Short's were making XOM out to be the public fool for grabbing IOC gas which isn't there!!  Not smart to diss XOM.  Wagging the gorilla is OK if done in a respectful manner.




RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - TomCrooz - 06-05-2013

This extra info on first press release would have been most appreciated. As they say in the commercial with the little kids....more is better


RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-05-2013

Per management they said what the attorneys for IOC and XOM allowed them to say and at that moment XOM attorneys ruled.


RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - charleydavid - 06-05-2013

Can you help me understand how Byker can stand in front of a microphone of a PNG paper and say that there are 'major terms' but not be allowed to reveal the details of the transaction.  If the CA that they have is so strong then what the heck is he doing answering any questions... why not 'I am not at liberty to discuss'

once again i think this is material and the company needs to end the speculation and commit to concrete details...




RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - Palm - 06-06-2013

Unless you or I have read the CAs themselves we can "demand" this or that all we want and it won't change what Byker or others can say based on what the attorneys allow them to say. What you or I "think" is immaterial.

I know this; IOC management wanted to disclose more in the original PR, but were advised they could not. I can beller all I want about that and it won't chnage what they will say. Obviously Byker was granted permission to put some color on what is being negotiated but with strict limitations on details. Again, he MUST abide by legal direction from both sides; IOC and Exxon. Exxon must have agreed that some material inaccuracies were being spewed about in the press and blessed Byker making the statements he did. Byker and others inside will NOT risk a great deal by saying things people on a message board feel should be disclosed. That's why you as a shareholder (presumably) have the right to use or flush, buy and sell, etc. We will get what we will get until all is finalized. Like it or not.


RE: XOM seeks 4.6 T - Major Terms Agreed To - ltinvest - 06-06-2013

"once again i think this is material and the company needs to end the speculation and commit to concrete details..."

We would all like to know the "concrete" details. However, at this point, only a terms sheet has been signed by both parties. They are close enough that Interoil was able to pick Exxon as the "winning bidder" and enter exclusive negotiations. Thus, the material event as declared by counsel. But negotiations continue and the next announcement will be the final terms in a signed agreement.