+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: FACT (/showthread.php?tid=3997)
FACT - freddiekingman - 06-25-2013
IOC 66.73
owned by THE SHORTS
not the shareholders.
RE: FACT - Libtardius Maximus - 06-25-2013
Yes and it is a sad reality.
RE: FACT - Tree - 06-25-2013
Until
RE: FACT - kkozkkoz - 06-25-2013
I'm thirsty and interoil is like my own mirage. I can practically taste the water but just as I reach out the water disappears, kinda of like the share price.
RE: FACT - sageo - 06-25-2013
Yep--- Very sad and pitiful .
RE: FACT - admin - 06-25-2013
If it was "owned" by the shorts it would be $0, or thereabouts. Let's not get carried away. It isn't only the shorts. Lots of people are in "show me" mood and it's somewhat difficult to blame them.
RE: FACT - jft310 - 06-25-2013
When IOC was $107 the shorts owned IOC?????? , iOC needs a closed deal and all is well
RE: FACT - tarulestheday - 06-25-2013
'jft310' pid='24877' datel Wrote:When IOC was $107 the shorts owned IOC?????? , iOC needs a closed deal and all is well
JFT, with all due respect, IOC traded at $107 for a few minutes that one day after the XOM disclosure. The shorts came in and slammed it back $18 that day. More proof that "iOC needs a closed deal and all is well" is pure wishful thinking.
RE: FACT - freddiekingman - 06-25-2013
(06-25-2013, 07:14 AM)jft310 Wrote:When IOC was $107 the shorts owned IOC?????? , iOC needs a closed deal and all is well
Hmm..now let's see...the stock opened at 107 and went down like 17 points in two hours or so.....longs did that?....the rest of the story we all know....c'mon jft....we're closing "the deal" since years...I'm long..didnt sell a share...but saying longs are in control here is way out of base......not?
FRUSTRATING DAYS...I TELL YOU.
RE: FACT - Tree - 06-25-2013
FACTS:
IOC is finalizing a deal with the largest energy company in the world.
The deal is very detailed and complicated and is being put into legal framework.
The deal with XOM is for much more than 4.6T -or- there will be more LNG deals following.
The deal will either close or not close.
PNG LNG partners cannot prevent, nor is there incentive to prevent, XOM feeding PNG LNG expansion with E/A gas.
What IOC states regarding the deal is XOM and CA approved.
IOC licenses will not expire and be rescinded.
The 2009 PA does not expire next week, rendering the project void.
This moment in time is exactly where all lamented IOC was previously not.
If IOC has the resource, it will be sold and that sales price is not reflected in the $/Mcf of the pps.
If IOC has the resource and IOC is finalizing a deal with XOM a great buying op is front and center.
Some horses are battle ready, some horses are spooky.