![]() |
|
|
E/A Option in Frame - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: E/A Option in Frame (/showthread.php?tid=5287) |
|
E/A Option in Frame - Tree - 11-22-2013
RE: E/A Option in Frame - Tusker - 11-22-2013
'Tree' pid='32299' datel Wrote: Oh Gosh... yes I am sure that OSE would like to participate in say 20K - 40K of GTL production. After all... OSH has the infrasturcture. Land me some more lines... I am starting to like you.
RE: E/A Option in Frame - Stavros - 11-22-2013 I'm still looking for IOC to provide gas for PNG Train#3 in return for a large equity position (XOM covets the gas and won't let it get away) and for IOC to partner with PNG plus one or more of the super majors on a Gulf-based LNG project (Governor Kavo covets the project and made it abundantly clear that he's happy it's coming. To top it off, condensate produced in concert with the gas will be used by IOC as refinery feed to replace nearly $1 billion per year in crude oil purchases. Only minimal refinery modifications are required to process the condendate instead of the crude. Flosh RE: E/A Option in Frame - Tree - 11-22-2013
.Oh Gosh... yes I am sure that OSE would like to participate in say 20K - 40K of GTL production. After all... OSH has the infrasturcture. Land me some more lines... I am starting to like you.
[/quote]
Tuckerbik, Humbling it is that a man named Rubik created a puzzle which contemporary's claimed was impossible to solve. I wonder exactly what independent infrastructure from PNG LNG is in consideration for E/A. Sigh, that sounds impossible....Hope there's enough smart guys to figure this out. |