![]() |
|
Iran Nuclear Program - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Politics and the US elections (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: Iran Nuclear Program (/showthread.php?tid=5317) |
Iran Nuclear Program - ArtM72 - 11-27-2013
For those who cannot accept the idea UN inspectors are reliable and impartial then this link won't make any difference to their perspective. I believe the deal as outlined here to be a major step towards peace in the Middle East, and an even larger step back from conflagration.
Unfortunately, one element necessary to properly understand this deal is the extreme difficulty in enriching uranium to weapons grade, notwithstanding the relative ease with which plutonium can be be refined to weapons grade. This is either unknown to Rep. Edward R. Royce (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, or something Royse refuses to publicly recognize for his own political purposes and/or the purposes of his political party.
RE: Iran Nuclear Program - admin - 11-29-2013 The Economist was fairly positive FWIW Not only was the deal with Iran the best on offer, but it can transform the world’s most troubled region The Iranian nuclear deal: Unlocking the Middle East | The Economist They differ with Bibi:
RE: Iran Nuclear Program - ArtM72 - 11-29-2013 Bibi's logic runs thusly: You can't negotiate until you establish tougher sanctions. Once you have established tougher sanctions, you can't negotiate until you establish tougher sanctions. He is caught in a classic infinite loop. It reminds me of an old time local grocer who gave all of his new employees a card which read on one side: "The customer is alway right. If the customer is not right, turn this card over." On the other side of the card it read: "The customer is alway right. If the customer is not right, turn this card over." The difference of course is the grocer had an end game. |