![]() |
|
|
Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut (/showthread.php?tid=5547) |
|
Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - Tree - 12-12-2013
RE: Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - Palm - 12-12-2013 Too much cost blow ups. RE: Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - ArtM72 - 12-12-2013 Kind of makes the PNG LNG project look like a bargain by comparison. Causes me to wonder how much pushback there is in the industry with respect to new capacity. Gives weight to Hession's statement regarding development certainty with Total. Hession knows blowups: "Mr Hession's future at Woodside was thrown into focus when the company admitted last month that building an LNG plant at James Price Point, north of Broome, would not be economically viable. Instead it has all but confirmed that it will pursue FLNG as Browse's development concept. "Woodside has not revealed the likely development cost of the James Price Point option. But industry sources have suggested the life-of-project budget could eclipse $80 billion, for a gas field only a third the size of Chevron's 40 trillion cubic feet of gas, $US52 billion Gorgon development." http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/wa/a/17063609/browse-project-boss-quits/ RE: Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - Tree - 12-13-2013
'Palm' pid='34100' datel Wrote:Too much cost blow ups.
That is a $17.3 Billion blow up, and that blow up amount alone, is in the ball-park with cost to build PNG LNG and likely, the cost for proposed 8Mtpa IOC/TOT plant.
Too much cost blow-ups. RE: Gorgontuan- Another $2 Billion BlowOut - Putncalls - 12-13-2013 Wouldn't modular plant be much more predictable? |