ShareholdersUnite Forums
OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Printable Version

+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? (/showthread.php?tid=6079)

Pages: 1 2


OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Tree - 02-28-2014

Hession readily welcomed OSH into the PRL.  GOBSMACK me if OSH can bull it's way into feeding PNG LNG expasion  with first cut of PRL15 at the expense of Gulf LNG and taking IOC/TOT to a close.   OSH/PacLNG close in a couple of weeks, is IOC/TOT close necessary a prerequisite?.   Can't see how it could be.  Gov't should back Guf LNG before 3rd train.  Solution is re-certify enough for both projects.

Or-

This move jeopardized TOT ambition per author.  This next 2 weeks may find XOM in powerplay for IOC or IOC stake.  Removal of Duma cleared the way for XOM as he was the vocal opposition to XOM and O'Neill lauded XOM lashup.

Bidding war anyone?

**********



PNG oil play hits Total's ambition


OIL Search has made a $US900 million ($1 billion) entry into Papua New Guinea's Elk and Antelope gas field that could spoil French major Total's entry into the fields.

In the move, to be funded by a $1.22bn share sale to the PNG government, Oil Search will buy Switzerland-based Pacific LNG's 22.84 per cent stake in the fields.

It will target using the gas fields to expand the $US19bn PNG liquefied natural gas plant being built by ExxonMobil (and in which Oil Search and Santos are partners) rather than Total's current plans for a stand-alone project.

The widely tipped buyout of the minority interests in the fields, whose majority owner InterOil has a conditional agreement to sell a stake to Total, comes after Oil Search earlier this week delayed its full-year profit report so it could finalise an acquisition.

The funding deal, in which PNG will pay $8.20 a share for 149.39 million shares in Oil Search, allows the government to maintain a presence in the company after its current 14.6 per cent stake is transferred to Abu Dhabi's International Petroleum Investment Company next month when convertible bonds mature.

Shares last traded on Monday at $8.57.

If the PNG funding deal goes ahead, the government will own just more than 10 per cent of the company.

"The Elk/Antelope resource is seen as the largest undeveloped field in the country and there is significant exploration upside attached," Oil Search's longstanding managing director Peter Botten said.

While not saying it outright, Mr Botten strongly indicated he would do all he could to bring the fields into the PNG LNG project.

He stressed his company's position as an infrastructure owner through PNG LNG and said the PNG government was keen to see the resource developed as quickly and efficiently as possible. Expanding PNG LNG would be quicker and cheaper than building a stand-alone project, the option Total and InterOil had been canvassing.

Exxon had spoken to InterOil about buying into Elk and Antelope but talks fell through, enabling Total to negotiate a still-to-be-finalised deal around plans to build a separate plant.

But the Oil Search acquisition may breach a condition in Total's preliminary deal to take a 61 per cent stake in Elk and Antelope from InterOil. The deal is conditional on Total acquiring the Pacific LNG stake.

"It's going to be an interesting few months ahead but we think we are well placed to influence the outcome," Mr Botten said.

He would not say whether Oil Search and Exxon had engaged in strategic discussions on the acquisition.

The Pacific LNG acquisition is unconditional and should be finalised in two weeks.

Mr Botten said Oil Search's apparent 15 per cent premium over Total's entry price was a mix of Oil Search seeing more gas being in the tenements and placing a higher strategic value on the ground.

That the purchase comes with pre-emptive rights over any other stake sale also helped.

UBS is arranging financing for the PNG government and Oil Search.

As a part of the PNG funding facility, UBS will establish a $700m hedge position in Oil Search through an institutional offer at $8.20 a share. If the PNG deal falls through, a $700m standby equity subscription has been executed.

The complex acquisition and unfolding ownership scenario rendered Oil Search's full-year results to sideshow status.

The company said full-year net profit rose 17 per cent to $US205.7m, which just beat expectations of $US202m.




RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - admin - 02-28-2014

["But the Oil Search acquisition may breach a condition in Total's preliminary deal to take a 61 per cent stake in Elk and Antelope from InterOil. The deal is conditional on Total acquiring the Pacific LNG stake."]

Huh?

Of course, the best solution would be to find and/or appraise more gas to be able to feed both..

Where is Exxon in all of this. From exclusivivity to seeing Total and their junior partner walk away with it.

And then there is Shell with plenty of cash, not to mention Woodside..


RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Tree - 02-28-2014

Henry Aldorf spent 35 years negotiating transactions like this. He is employed by PacLNG and likely is Civelli's negotiator. Surely represents PacLNG's interests, not IOC's. i'd be GOGSMACKED if he's not charged with maxing his boss's windfall in this transaction. 'You can only sell this once'


RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - SamAdams - 02-28-2014

Tree, that's a great insight. I posted on another thread that this was like a three way trade in baseball and that Civelli probably engineered it and I had forgotten about Aldorf. Perhaps he was the mastermind behind this deal that solve issues for PacLNG, PNG., OSH and IOC.


RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Brew Swillis - 02-28-2014


Oil Search readies for PNG with $900 million outlay




Date






 


Oil Search will spend $US900 million acquiring expansion options for the PNG LNG project as the venture moves closer to start-up.

Oil Search said late Thursday it will acquire a 23 per cent stake in the Elk/Antelope gas discoveries, which the Canadian based InterOil has been seeking to develop. At the same time, the PNG government will buy 149.3 million Oil Search shares at $8.20 a share which will help to fund the acquisition.
This comes as the PNG government is to transfer an existing 14.7 per cent Oil Search shareholding to the International Petroleum Investment Corp, an arm of the Abu Dhabi government, under an earlier funding agreement.
The PNG government had sought to reacquire the IPIC holding, but the decision was taken to place shares with the government.
Advertisement
The PNG LNG project is now 95 per cent completed, with commissioning trials under way with the first shipments likely in the September quarter.
Oil Search said the Elk/Antelope field is complementary to its existing assets with significant upside, describing it as ''the largest remaining undeveloped gas resource in PNG''.
Oil Search said the PNG government has made it clear it supported all of the country's gas resources being ''commercialised in the shortest practical timeframe''.
The acquisition also opens the door for Oil Search to acquire an interest in additional acreage in PNG including the Triceratops gas discovery, it said. Oil Search managing director Peter Botten said the PNG gas project could support ''two maybe three more trains''.
Separately, Oil Search said it earned a net profit of $205.7 million in 2013, up from $US175.8 million a year earlier as it benefited from higher revenue and lower exploration costs




RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Putncalls - 02-28-2014

I didn't see anything that said that PAC LNG's stake had to be acquired by Total?


RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - jft310 - 02-28-2014

The newspaper Australian has a poor history in getting stories right. Careful .




RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Libtardius Maximus - 02-28-2014

[quote='jft310' pid='38311' dateline='1393585527']

The newspaper Australian has a poor history in getting stories right. Careful .

Lemme guess...self awareness is not your strong suit.




RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - Tree - 02-28-2014

'jft310' pid='38311' datel Wrote:

The newspaper Australian has a poor history in getting stories right. Careful .

Confucius Say:  In PNG, Gov't get what Gov't want.  Careful.

And aside:

Botten..."That puts Oil Search inside both the major energy joint ventures in PNG, led by ExxonMobil's $19 billion PNG LNG project, where Oil Search owns a 29 percent stake. "And with us sitting where we're at in both joint ventures and having a range of other gas resources we're uniquely situated to drive the future of LNG in PNG," Managing Director Peter Botten told reporters. There is enough gas at Elk and Antelope and other gas fields held by Oil Search to feed three new liquefied natural gas units, which could involve a new standalone LNG plant, supply gas for an expansion of the PNG LNG project, or a combination. "We will be pushing for and the government is focused on pushing for capital efficient, fast-to-market development," Botten said".   He highlighted that was in contrast to LNG developments in Australia, where multibillion dollar LNG plants are being built side-by-side in Queensland, resulting in massive cost overruns as the companies competed for labour and equipment. - See more at: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/131842/Oil_Search_Positions_for_LNG_Expansion_with_900M_PNG_Buy#sthash.RNxdKsDE.dpuf- See more at: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/131842/Oil_Search_Positions_for_LNG_Expansion_with_900M_PNG_Buy#sthash.It1P0GlO.dpuf

Hession...A Material Interest in a Partnership that Offers Real Benefits

InterOil's Chief Executive Officer, Dr Michael Hession, said: "Oil Search is a logical partner for us in developing these large gas resources.  The company has decades of experience in PNG and is nearing production from PNG LNG.

"It is exceptionally rewarding to know that someone as experienced as Oil Search shares our view of the worth of this resource. This not only validates the value of this world class asset in Elk-Antelope but acknowledges the upside in this asset and the surrounding acreage.

"This partnership will enable us to tap these energy resources more quickly and cost-effectively – and that translates into real financial benefits for Papua New Guinea and the shareholders of the companies involved.

"We welcome Oil Search into our development of Elk-Antelope with Total and look forward to an even closer cooperation with the people and Government of Papua New Guinea in the years ahead. This project and the partnership have the clear backing of the Government, ensuring we have a strong and stable foundation to deliver on this outstanding long-term project."

Remember when PNG LNG expansion made greatest sense a year ago, when XOM gained exclusivity, O'Neill and Parliamanent lauded the plan? Why, it made best sense.  Still does, as part of a greater development.  Provides us with a fast track CSP stripping gold from PRL15.  All agree there is too much gas for a single PNG LNG train.  Careful.  Connect the dots I posit.




RE: OSH move jeopardize Gulf LNG? - jft310 - 03-01-2014

Tree daddy this is part of the report which I don't think is correct
"That the purchase comes with pre-emptive rights over any other stake sale also helped."
everyone seems intent on a quick monetization path so the quickest path must be E/A gas for train
3 that seems simple cause the pipe has room for 3 trains with only 2 trains being used. But for a fourth or fifth train things get
interesting. Those trains would require a néw pipeline. Total is the majority partner and with Interoil and with their own project
They get a larger slice of the LNG pie. Oil Search gets an even larger slice of the LNG revenue with an ownership in both
projects. This explains the Botten statement. So do Total and Interoil want 15 percent of the LNG revenue
from a third Exxon train if they could even get that large of an ownership position or 30 percent ownership in their own project.
That answer would hinge on the LNG pie division. Would make economic sense to use the LNG revenue from train
3 to build their own plant because of the lower partner count and thus higher LNG ownership of a Gulf project. Botten still wins
as OSH would own a larger percent  of a Gulf project than they ever could own in a combined project. Based
on what we know today this makes the most sense.
As with all things PNG it's subject to change before being completed