![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG (/showthread.php?tid=7431) |
||||||||||||
Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - Justin94360 - 09-26-2014
RE: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - Palm - 09-26-2014 Have to remember Blair plays both sides of the fence. RE: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - jft310 - 09-26-2014 The comments about collaboration are from Macquarie see article . This chatter about collaboration may have prompted Minister Durbin to make his comments. Seems to me the govt carries a big stick . RE: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - kommonsents - 09-27-2014
'Justin94360' pid='50041' datel Wrote: Soounds like we are waiting for the dispute and arbitration process to resolve itself which should boost the pps handsomely. RE: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - davidhmtk - 09-27-2014
'jft310' pid='50043' datel Wrote:The comments about collaboration are from Macquarie see article . This chatter about collaboration may have prompted Minister Durbin to make his comments. Seems to me the govt carries a big stick . Not to mention that they are significant shareholders in Oilsearch RE: Total eyes two Gulf LNG trains in PNG - kommonsents - 09-27-2014
'davidhmtk' pid='50061' datel Wrote: Which prompts the question. Would PNG change the rules and allow OSH to be Operator of the new LNG plant? That could be a game changer in many ways. |