![]() |
|
Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Kaliboo comments on oil prices (/showthread.php?tid=8014) Pages:
1
2
|
Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Kaliboo - 01-09-2015 "It's difficult to make predictions, especially about the future." So use or flush. I've lived through multiple gas and oil gluts before. It's de ja vu all over again. I've seen all the signs before and see the different things that could make this quite different. I saw the US gas glut coming a lot earlier than most and expected the horizontal drilling/fracking technology to replilcate around the world, creating a global natural gas glut in a very short period of time. I expected there was a good probability the same technology could lead to a global oil glut not long after that but was less certain if that would occur. Here's what happened instead. The global gas glut has not yet happened for a few reasons. Globally there has been high resistance to horizontal drilling with hydraulica fracturing, especially in Europe and it is slowly spreading here. In other places like China, the targeted shales are different than the USA and not nearly as productive. So the gas miracle seems mostly limited to the USA so far. Also reportedly obtaining water for fracking in the quantities needed in these foreign places like China can be much more problematic. Lastly, the USA did not move to exporting LNG to any degree that could have initated a glut. Within a ~5 year period the USA transformed from being the number 1 world destination for planned LNG imports, to becoming self sufficient with over a 100 year supply, soley due to technology used by private and publicly trade oil companies to unlock shale gas. (Politicians had zero to do with it.) When gas prices plummeted in the USA due to the sudden gas glut, oil companies did a major pivot over several months moving away from dry gas fields to high liquids gas and oil fields, such as the Eagleford. Then they took the same technology back to very old West Texas fields. That in conjunction with other onshore oil drilling activity in e.g., the Baaken, resulted in huge increases in annual US crude oil production of the order of 1 Mln BOPD increase each year.. THAT EVENT which has been ongoing for several years now is the primary driver for the global oil glut. Energy officials have said we will be self sufficient in crude oil production (before the price collapse) in just a few years. No one saw this coming just a few years ago. Russians and others (Iraq and Libya) have returned to peak production. Canadian oil sands also are delivering. So the glut is here, but for how long? I believe it could be very long term - years. Why? It's different this time. Onshore shale drilling can be turned up, down, off or on like a light switch in a relatively short period of time. That capability didn't exist just a few years ago. Conversely deepwater is a very long term investment and development period with some fields having lives up to 50 years and longer. So this low price environment may present lower cost field investment opportunities for deepwater companies to buy low and sell high. Construction costs will be dropping, rig costs will be dropping. Some may view this as simply a short term, advantageous blip in a 50+ year investment, i.e., just noise. So they will keep on moving forward with these new projects at least for the next 2 years. Some companies with deep pockets are looking for cheap reserves to buy, but with not too much debt attached to it. The Saudi's state they will allow the price to float with supply and demand, but they (and thus OPEC) aren't going to reduce production. In fact some members are increasing production. Their stated objective is to allow the falling price to eliminate the high cost producers and reduce the global supply, leading to the return of higher prices. They may be seriously under estimating how long this will take. As I have always said, the best remedy for an oil glut, is an oil glut and the best remedy for high oil prices is high oil prices. When market forces are allowed to work, it becomes a self correcting market with stable pricing. The best outcome will be that the lower cost crude will result in a huge global economic stimulus for most of the world, which in turn, will increase energy consumption. So the Saudi's hope would be that the size of the demand pie will grow significantly so that they not only retain market share, but the size of the slice will be much bigger as demand could become much larger than ever before. But this will drive prices back up again. As noted, the US onshore business can quicky respond to higher prices to increase supply again. Also, Mexico, which has huge reserves is just in the early stages of opening its industry to international players for the first time. This could add very large volumes to the market. So there will be plenty of supply potential for many years to come. If these responses to price increases are rapid, as I think they could be, then we could see much higher price volatility, but a tendency to border on glut for a long time. And if Europe, China and Japan economies don't perform better, then it will be even longer. I'm agreeing with others that oil will go under $30. I expect it this year and soon. As we have seen it will drag the PPS of all oil and gas companies down with it. If you can call the bottom and wait it out, you can maybe make a whole lot of money. I think the controlling factor (other than a major war or natural catastrophe) is availability of skilled technical staff. There is plenty of supply right now with PETE college classes at record enrollments (my daughter is one of them). The "Big Crew Change", an industry term for the massive wave of retirement (oilfield baby boomers) that is now in progress and will be for several more years, is being accelerated by this event. The most experienced people are leaving the industry permanently at a high rate. If low prices are sustained long enough then companies will sever tons of people and likely won't hire much if any young ones, and all these technical people will find jobs in other industries or just retire. So if low prices drag on long enought, then when prices do begin to rise, there won't be experienced technical staff available. No staff, no drilling, no production increase. It will take 5 or more years to rebuld the organizations with staff having enough competence to do the highly complex, technically challenging work. In this scenario, if the global economy is hot from the economic stimulus of low oil prices especially, then we could see the pendulum rapidly move to the other extreme with unprecedented high prices (in real $), that would make $100 oil look cheap. And of course very high prices would create a huge oil boom for several years, until the cycle repeats. And on and on. Gluts come and go. At some point the world is going to wake up that consumers are spending all of this extra cash everywhere they go, every day, and it just might spark an economic boom. It could happen very fast, unless some other kind of very bad news precedes it and derails it (e.g., deflation fears in Europe). Lastly, with a global oil glut and a gas glut in the USA, what is everyone focusing on? What's left? Natural gas to Asia while prices are good. So some day a glut will arrive there, and based on the recent events, it's likley much sooner than I think. We already have read of sharp spot price declines. The hope is that global growth with get ahead of the energy supply and stay ahead of it. However, technology is getting better and better at creating excessive supplies and improving efficiencies while stupid people all over the earth are driving the nations into deeper and deeper debt. The low cost producers will reign, but the competition will be tough. IOC/Total appear to have a good shot, but time is of the essence. This could be a great time for them to build a plant with other LNG plants being cancelled and presumably construction costs should be falling. Catching a lower cost capital investment cycle and thenstarting production just as an oil glut is ending would be sweet. It's very different this time. Kaliboo Use or flush. RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - admin - 01-09-2015 ["When market forces are allowed to work, it becomes a self correcting market with stable pricing. The best outcome will be that the lower cost crude will result in a huge global economic stimulus for most of the world, which in turn, will increase energy consumption. So the Saudi's hope would be that the size of the demand pie will grow significantly so that they not only retain market share, but the size of the slice will be much bigger as demand could become much larger than ever before."] Couple of things:
RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Palm - 01-09-2015 Good points STP. The real trick is posting "knowns" before they happen. For instance: if one "knows" what the cycle/trend is, what will be the likely price of oil this coming fall when IOC should be close to having EA delineation done? Otherwise I can say Tuesday morning that I knew who was going to win the college football champion on Monday night. RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Relker - 01-09-2015 Not all people are convinced that the fracking revolution will turn things upside down, see below article: Chesapeake Energy’s (CHK) Serenity 1-3H well near Oklahoma City came in as a gusher in 2009, pumping more than 1,200 barrels of oil a day and kicking off a rush to drill that extended into Kansas. Now the well produces less than 100 barrels a day, state records show. Serenity’s swift decline sheds light on a dirty secret of the oil boom: It may not last. Shale wells start strong and fade fast, and producers are drilling at a breakneck pace to hold output steady. In the fields, this incessant need to drill is known as the Red Queen, after the character in Through the Looking-Glass who tells Alice, “It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.” The U.S. is producing 7.8 million barrels of oil a day, more than it has in a quarter-century. Crude from shale formations has cut reliance on imports and put the U.S. closer to energy independence than it’s been since 1989. The International Energy Agency predicted last year that the U.S. would overtake Saudi Arabia by 2020 as the world’s largest producer. Whether current production can hold up is the subject of debate. David Hughes, a geoscientist and president of Global Sustainability Research, has examined the life span of shale wells. “The Red Queen syndrome just gets worse and worse and worse,” he says. “The higher production goes, the more wells you need to offset the decline.” STORY: Here's the Good News About Fracking The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that about 29 percent of U.S. oil production today comes from so-called tight oil formations. These dense layers of rock and shale are cracked open by blasting water, sand, and chemicals deep underground, creating fissures that allow the oil to flow into horizontal pipes, some of them thousands of feet long. Production from wells bored into these formations declines by 60 percent to 70 percent in the first year alone, says Allen Gilmer, chairman and chief executive officer of Drillinginfo, which tracks the performance of U.S. wells. Traditional wells take two years to slide 50 percent to 55 percent, and they can keep pumping for 20 years or more. In North Dakota’s Bakken shale, a well formally known as Robert Heuer 1-17R put out 2,358 barrels in May 2004, when it went live. The output proved there was money to be made drilling in the Bakken and kicked off an oil rush in North Dakota. Continental Resources (CLR), the well’s operator, built a monument to it. Production declined 69 percent in the first year. “I look at shale as more of a retirement party than a revolution,” says Art Berman, a petroleum geologist who spent 20 years with what was then Amoco and now runs his own firm, Labyrinth Consulting Services, in Sugar Land, Tex. “It’s the last gasp.” There are plenty of people who disagree. Aubrey McClendon, founder and former president and CEO of Chesapeake, called Berman a “third-tier geologist” in a 2011 interview on CNBC’s Mad Money With Jim Cramer. Harold Hamm, the chairman and CEO of Continental, estimated in 2010 that there were 24 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the Bakken and other formations underlying the Williston basin. Now, Hamm says improved technology could eventually boost that number to 45 billion: “We’re just getting started,” he says. Since Continental drilled the Robert Heuer, North Dakota’s oil production has increased more than 10-fold to 874,000 barrels a day, beating Ecuador and Qatar, the two smallest members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. STORY: A Fracking Pioneer Abandons One of Its Earliest Land Grabs Global Sustainability’s Hughes estimates the U.S. needs to drill 6,000 new wells per year at a cost of $35 billion to maintain current production. His research also shows that the newest wells aren’t as productive as those drilled in the first years of the boom, a sign that oil companies have already tapped the best spots, making it that much harder to keep breaking records. Hughes has predicted that production will peak in 2017 and fall to 2012 levels within two years. “The hype about U.S. energy independence and ‘Saudi America’ is deafening if you look at the mainstream media,” Hughes says. “We need to have a much more in-depth and intelligent discussion about this.” On Oct. 7, Abdalla Salem el-Badri, OPEC’s secretary general, said at a conference in Kuwait that U.S. shale producers are “running out of sweet spots” and that output will peak in 2018. STORY: A Shrinking U.S. Trade Deficit—Brought to You by Fracking previous 12 next The bottom line: America needs 6,000 new wells a year, at a cost of $35 billion, to maintain current oil production. Loder is a reporter for Bloomberg News in New York. RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - admin - 01-10-2015 I used to take these skeptical views relatively seriously, but I think that's becoming quite a bit more difficult, to be honest. The Saudi's think the shale revolution is real and they're throwing everything and the kitchen sink at it... RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - johnwgrant - 01-10-2015 Kaliboo... I have read that the oil "glut" or imbalance is about 2% (while the price has dropped about 50%). If that is true (2% imbalance), doesn't the marginal cost of production come into play very quickly (6 months)? In other words, there are high-cost fields that are just not economical to produce at sub $50/barrel oil. Once these producing assets are shut-in (or don't even come online ever), don't we come to an equilibrium point fairly quickly? Now, all this discussion is moot if we are about to enter a world-wide meltdown that will reduce consumption by 20% !!! However, excluding the end-of-civilization-type scenarios, it would seem that oil pricing and supply/demand will work their magic fairly quickly - by which I mean 6 months or so. That being said, what do I know !??! Hession may go from being the "dummy who sold EA gas in the ground for $1/mcf" to the "genius who sold EA gas in the ground for $1/mcf" since by the time TOTAL cuts the check, the price InterOil receives may look very lucrative indeed.... RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - cybersssss - 01-10-2015 I think the longer term contract pricing of oil and natural gas is a better indication of true supply and demand economics. The spot pricing is more speculative in nature. The long term pricing is around 75 dollars. FWIW RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - johnwgrant - 01-10-2015
'cybersssss' pid='53888' datel Wrote:I think the longer term contract pricing of oil and natural gas is a better indication of true supply and demand economics. The spot pricing is more speculative in nature. The long term pricing is around 75 dollars. FWIW Just curious where you are getting the $75/barrel long-term pricing... Are you looking at the oil futures pricing? RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Putncalls - 01-10-2015 RJ is guessing 68 in 2015 and 80+ in 2016. These new US wells do require more maintenance. That is why shale oil has to cost 50$ and that is a US price. Transportation raises the minimum world price to around 60$. There are no slackers in these drilling projects. The roughnecks are working hard. RE: Kaliboo comments on oil prices - Thylacine-2 - 01-10-2015 Kalliboo, thanks for your analysis. A place where I differ is that I don't see low oil prices being a long term phenomenon. Most of the increased production in recent years can be attributed to the bloom of shale oil, characterized by high decline rates. That's not a bad thing in itself. Another way of looking at it is that the wells have quick payout, with most of the ultimate recovery front loaded. Shale oil needs to be understood as something like mining. Got to keep digging in mining and got to keep drilling in the shale oil business. And I don't see how the shale oil companies can keep a high drilling rate if the price of oil is low. Granted that some companies can ramp up drilling in relatively short order. But, as I see it, they will only do that if the price of oil is a lot higher than it is now. So I don't see how low prices could last for years. Too much of the current oversupply is oil which is expensive to produce. |