ShareholdersUnite Forums
Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - Printable Version

+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge (/showthread.php?tid=8162)



Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - Palm - 02-11-2015


Total’s Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge


By Sara Stefanini
Posted 10 February 2015 13:45 GMT

The outlook for a second standalone LNG plant in Papua New Guinea looks brighter after an arbitration panel dismissed a challenge to Total’s deal to join InterOil’s promising Elk and Antelope fields on Tuesday.

The International Chamber of Commerce arbitration panel in Singapore rejected shareholder Oil Search’s attempt to assert its pre-emptive right over Total’s agreement to farm into petroleum retention licence (PRL) 15, which covers the two onshore gas fields.

The decision puts to rest considerable uncertainty around the project – and speculation that, had the court sided with Oil Search and pushed Total out of the deal, it could have made way for ExxonMobil to farm in.

Oil Search is a partner in Exxon’s existing PNG LNG plant and has said the Elk/Antelope project could be developed more quickly and economically with Exxon involved, analysts at Bernstein Research noted on Tuesday.

However, the analysts argued Exxon’s involvement also posed risks to Elk/Antelope – causing delays in favour of first expanding PNG LNG, restricting the size of the Elk/Antelope plant to comply with Exxon’s higher threshold for reserves certification, or forcing InterOil to feed the gas into PNG LNG instead.

InterOil reached a long-awaited deal with Total in December 2013 after talks with Exxon fell through earlier that year. Total bought a 61.3% stake in PRL 15 from InterOil – leaving the Texan company with 14.3% – and took over as operator of the LNG project.

Leader of the Pac

The French major had also planned to buy the remaining shares from a joint venture known as the Pac LNG Group. However, Oil Search swooped in and bought the share before Total could close. Soon after, the Australian company asserted its pre-emptive rights.

Despite the arbitration, Total, InterOil and Oil Search have moved ahead with exploration and appraisal in the Elk and Antelope fields, as well as plans for an LNG plant that Total plans to start building in Q3 2017.

Peter O’Neill, Papua New Guinea’s prime minister, has shown support for the second plant, urging Total not to delay in response to the oil price decline. “It is currently a prudent time to invest in Papua New Guinea’s resources infrastructure in anticipation of a return to better pricing,” he said last week.

Port Moresby is also backing Exxon’s plans to add a third train to the 6.9 mtpa PNG LNG. The two sides signed a memorandum of understanding last month that clears the way for the JV to reach an FID by the end of 2017.




RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - kerekesc - 02-11-2015

Great post, Palm.  However, having been waiting on pins and needles for months, the response to this fantastic news is a downer.  No movement in the pps, and no response/opinions from the knowledgeable contributors on this board.  What gives?  Could the person who said that lately good news just seems to result in lower pps be right?




RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - Palm - 02-11-2015

It's a great piece of news, but not anything that will rocket pps. They still have many things to get done and certification is the next biggest. I do think people missed how important this was for IOC. People have been saying if OSH wins it's neutral to good anyways because there would be quicker monetization, etc. I've pointed out before a clause that's in the SPA that to me suggests that it could have been quite bad for IOC if they lost. There is a clause in the Seller warranties that stated that IOC (Seller) warrants to Buyer (Total) that the SPA agreement does not violate any other agreements including any preemptive rights..... Or something like that. I think there was a good chance that Total could/would come back against IOC had OSH prevailed. Obviously not a lawyer, but that clause is in the SPA.

So with this hurdle out of the way they have many more steps in the process. Drilling news which confirms good/better/best estimates will likely see pps gradually move up over time. We just have to keep hanging in there as hard as that may be. Or sell, or buy more.......

It is funny seeing people think that all of a sudden there will be a buyout because of this ruling. I don't think so, again because of the things that have to happen yet to "prove" what's down there which gets us to the certification payment. MAYBE then we see a play, but I'm certainly not betting on that.


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - jft310 - 02-11-2015

Today oil the commodity is down 4 percent , XLE is down 1.2 percent and Interoil is up .
Not bad.
The spread on the dollars to be received by Interoil is over $1 Billion in the fourth quarter and the dates need to be firmed up for the discounted cash flow models work .
As Hession has stated "shareholders are just gonna have to wait "" viewing the Dec filing so far those BIG boys TOP shareholders not margined are holding . They are waiting .
The next earning release could be end of March and we should hear news from Ant 4 and 5 as regards height of reservoir rock columns at that time . Then we hear end of June @ the connectivity and flow test results , plant design choice . Then to prepare for the 4 th quarter payment .


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - Palm - 02-11-2015

I do think that flow test is another "biggie" as we move along JFT. Drilling, testing, certifying. Hope we see that pattern repeated many times over the next years.


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - jft310 - 02-11-2015

Palm- per the slides all wrapped up by June 30 . Flow test and connectivity and Ant 4 and 5 results all wrapped up by then . I expect drilling through the end of the year but that's from Wahoo , Antelope Deep and Triceratops maybe more .


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - ArtM72 - 02-11-2015

It will be interesting to see how many IOC drilling problems suddenly disappear.


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - jft310 - 02-11-2015

Art- they will say it's the new rigs which has a basis in fact . Two new High Arctic rigs on the way .
Finishing Ant 4 and 5 early with published results feeds the takeover monster. Don't want that want to build the plant and then expand it . Window for takeover closes with Total payday opens again right before the plant opens . My opinion.


RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - ArtM72 - 02-12-2015

'jft310' pid='54887' datel Wrote:Art- they will say it's the new rigs which has a basis in fact . Two new High Arctic rigs on the way . Finishing Ant 4 and 5 early with published results feeds the takeover monster. Don't want that want to build the plant and then expand it . Window for takeover closes with Total payday opens again right before the plant opens . My opinion.

I never did buy your report that a structural member on the A4 rig broke and was fixed in a day but the government had to approve the fix and that approval took a month.  If true that story would fit into one of those conspiracy theories floating about.

I'm not so sure what theory underlies your suggestion that there are windows opening and closing for IOC's buyout.  Every buyout is entered with risk and reward.  Risk and reward might slide up and down in time like a window but I can't imagine any IOC buyout window ever closing (absent a government takeover).

A theory that was advanced quite some time ago continues to make the most sense to me.  That theory goes no major wants to start a bidding war for IOC because of a shared belief the sum of IOC's parts might be acquired at a cost less than that of the whole.

So as I sit back and enjoy a cup of Papua New Guinea coffee from Dunn Bros I'll just quietly celebrate the Total victory.  That victory will if nothing else help assure competition for IOC's gas




RE: Total's Elk/Antelope stake secured after court throws out challenge - jft310 - 02-12-2015

My report about the strut comes from 3 sources . One in the IR dept , one from a former employee one from a PNGer . Not sure call IR or email em . Post your results here. Thanks
Common sense says as each box is checked off the monetization list the price to buy IOC rises as uncertainty is reduced . The uncertainty causes the volatility as it is reduced the volatility is reduced . Simple way to look at is a seismic picture more valuable than a drilled well ?? What is IOC gonna do for the next ten years says Laurie Brown poke holes in the ground drill and monetize . Each appraised new well adds some type value . So IOC is cheaper before the drilling than after . Keep it simple .