Investors Conference Call - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Nautilus Minerals (NUSMF) (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=41) +--- Thread: Investors Conference Call (/showthread.php?tid=8404) Pages:
1
2
|
Investors Conference Call - scampoco - 04-14-2015 TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Apr 13, 2015) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (NUS.TO)(NUSMF) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") will hold a conference call and audio/webcast to update investors on the Company's progress on Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 10.00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. Hopefully we get some questions answered about funding going forward. RE: Investors Conference Call - maui4marko - 04-14-2015
'scampoco' pid='56883' datel Wrote:
Conference Call Details RE: Investors Conference Call - seascandive - 04-14-2015 Odd that there's only 24 hours heads-up. RE: Investors Conference Call - seabedmining - 04-14-2015 call very soon after announcment - i've not a good feeling RE: Investors Conference Call - seabedmining - 04-14-2015 Presentation is out - looks promising RE: Investors Conference Call - Wulli - 04-15-2015 Only one question ? Can not believe it But very good to keep touch with the small investors and provide more updates in the nearer future RE: Investors Conference Call - maui4marko - 04-15-2015
'Wulli' pid='56911' datel Wrote:Only one question ? Can not believe it But very good to keep touch with the small investors and provide more updates in the nearer future Actually there were two questions from one person.
Q1. Amount of slack time in vessel critical path timeline? Also a couple of my other notes:
RE: Investors Conference Call - maui4marko - 04-15-2015 For those who would like to listen to the call: http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/mabz62gs RE: Investors Conference Call - scampoco - 04-15-2015 Did anyone catch the information when he was talking about possibly having the significant integration being done by the China company. I assume that is Fujian Mawei (about 17 minutes in). Does this mean that it will be good for the CAPEX in that the cost of the integration will be born by MAC and Fujian Mawei under the contract to lease? If so then it is not Capital out of pocket for Nautilus bringing the burn per month down in these final years? I get that it could potentially shorten the critical path but unsure of how this is good for the CAPEX. I have obviously never built a ship before especially with so many complicated partnerships - lol. Anyone able to help me out here? RE: Investors Conference Call - maui4marko - 04-15-2015
'scampoco' pid='56921' datel Wrote:Did anyone catch the information when he was talking about possibly having the significant integration being done by the China company. I assume that is Fujian Mawei (about 17 minutes in). Does this mean that it will be good for the CAPEX in that the cost of the integration will be born by MAC and Fujian Mawei under the contract to lease? If so then it is not Capital out of pocket for Nautilus bringing the burn per month down in these final years? I get that it could potentially shorten the critical path but unsure of how this is good for the CAPEX. I have obviously never built a ship before especially with so many complicated partnerships - lol. Anyone able to help me out here? Yes scampoco, that's how I heard it as well. It saves time and money a couple ways, as instead of doing the component integration in Singapore (the original plan) after the vessel is delivered by Fujian, they are validating whether Fujian themselves can do some of the integration as the ship is built. Additionally, it shifts the cost to MAC as part of the lease agreement, and thus no additional out-of-pocket for Nautilus. The time savings was quoted as 1 month, which is not a lot ( <3% ), but everything helps. It was stated on the conference call that the timeline is "tight" meaning not a lot of slack in it. From everything I see, they are following good project management practices... a small amount of contingency in case they really need it, but not so much as to load up the schedule with too much slack. |