Has been doing some chin scratching and deduction and research on those 4 SM's into LNG and in PNG. We've made all the cases why none of the 4 should lose the Gulf LNG stake. Does 1 SM wins first train stake? 1 makes the most sense and is currently the most under committed in LNG at this time. That is the 1 that wins.
|
Elder in Chicago
|
|
|
01-19-2013, 03:11 AM
01-19-2013, 03:14 AM
'Tree' pid='16209' datel Wrote: Cheveron, followed by a bidding war between Shell and Exxon?
01-19-2013, 03:25 AM
Shell will not go quietly into the night
01-19-2013, 03:32 AM
'Optionray' pid='16210' datel Wrote: Option-- I vote with you. As I stated recently, Chevron sitting on 21+ billion in cash( and now they are working more with China) and their costs in Australia are skyrocketing ,it seems logical that PNG would have greater interest to them.
01-19-2013, 05:33 AM
Exxon has the most to gain with the least money if the PNG govt would allow and see the newly announces LNG bldg on Port Moresby
01-19-2013, 05:56 AM
'jft310' pid='16217' datel Wrote:Exxon has the most to gain with the least money if the PNG govt would allow and see the newly announces LNG bldg on Port Moresby Gee, maybe that T in the aquatic pipeline isn't for feeding Gulf LNG from the Highlands BUT its for accepting dry gas from E/A to be processed at PNG LNG?? Huh, I guess that makes most sense as feedstock from E/A should easily be much less $/M than the $7/M gas PNG LNG receives from itself. Should be worth more to XOM I'd guess. Hello Operator.......connect me to the train station. Toot Toot
01-28-2013, 11:33 AM
The elder had an epiphany (again) tonight and reached out with an hmmm.
01-28-2013, 11:41 AM
It was Electra maybe 4 years ago that posted on Yahoo ." Its an Exxon Island". She knew back then is my take. She is an OIl Engineer from Australia its guessed.Schlumberger employee??? Just guessing on who Electra might be.
| |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

