Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PNG's Problematic Political Culture
#1

Bad public investments stand in the way of PNG's great Asian future

By Online Editor
10:57 am GMT+12, 17/10/2013, Papua New Guinea

 A glance at a map points to Papua New Guinea's wonderful potential. It's parked between its former coloniser Australia - with its first-world standards, powerful resources industry and massive funds under management - and Asia, the global epicentre of economic growth and the great new source of both markets and capital.
 
Appropriately, as a bank which has pinned its future on gaining a handy slice of that Asian and -- surprisingly rewardingly -- Pacific growth, ANZ has commissioned a report that projects an Asian future for PNG.
 
Port Jackson Partners produced this stimulating document.
 
That makes sense, since for 17 years the consultancy had Rod Sims as a senior partner.
 
The chairman of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission was in the past a senior official in PNG's Finance Ministry and he has maintained a considerable interest in the country.
 
The report has already been presented to impressive gatherings of PNG's private sector, via the chambers of commerce in Port Moresby and Lae, and will now be road-showed in Brisbane, Auckland, Beijing and Singapore.
 
It looks at the medium term to 2030 and urges a development approach that brings together the three key activities in the economy: resources, agriculture -- including fisheries, with PNG owning the world's biggest tuna resource -- and infrastructure development, which starts from a remarkably low base.
 
The report makes eminent rational sense in concluding: "Asia promises to become the world's major supplier of capital during the 21st century, and a virtuous circle of trade and investment will converge for PNG.
 
“Now is the time to begin a national conversation about clear and obvious threshold issues.”
 
Indeed. But standing in the way looms a single momentous obstacle: PNG's political culture.
 
Prime Minister Peter O'Neill is a can-do kind of leader and has the support of about 104 of the 111 MPs and a further four years to run. The odds appear strong, at this early stage, that he might even be able to secure a second five-year term. Certainly, he's the most powerful politician since the emergence of Michael Somare -- who is still in parliament some 45 years on.
 
But can he cut through on the key issues identified in the report, titled “Bold Thinking: Imagining PNG in the Asian Century”?
 
It's only a tiny step from “bold” to “brave”, the epithet with which Sir Humphrey damned any outbreak of independence in TV's Yes, Minister.
 
The key issue is the role of government. The country's history has demonstrated -- with the privatisation of the state bank and the arrival of Digicel as a virtual private-sector monopoly -- that the government needs to get out of running businesses.
 
It should focus on its core role as regulator, umpire and provider of services the private sector can't or won't deliver -- particularly schools and health.
 
Instead, and in the face of all experience, it is now seeking to expand its role -- taking over the Ok Tedi mine, talking of doing the same with the Frieda River prospect and halting the biggest private-sector capital injection into agribusiness for some years, apparently because it comes from a Malaysian blue-chip foreign source.
 
Politicians are widely seeking or even demanding stakes for the government in new or expanding projects. An oil palm investor was told to give 40 per cent to a provincial government before being given access to land even though a deal had already being completed with landowners. Yet the performance of government in business has been woeful. The ANZ report has found that despite user charges way above commensurate amounts elsewhere, PNG's four biggest state-owned enterprises return only 1.7 per cent on their asset base annually.
 
Appropriately, while PJP's Grant Mitchell was presenting the report to an audience of more than 200 at the Port Moresby Yacht Club, the power kept being cut off.
 
The business people rolled their eyes in resigned familiarity while Mitchell shrugged his shoulders and carried on.
 
Pete Celso, the managing director of Philippines-owned RD Tuna Canners, which employs up to 4000 people in Madang -- the biggest single manufacturing operation in the country -- says it costs him more to use PNG Power's supply from the grid than to run his own generator.
 
It also costs him more to send a container of canned tuna up the shockingly pot-holed highway to Mount Hagen than to ship it half way round the world to Hamburg.
 
Culturally, the challenge rotates around the desire of the political elite -- now pretty well united within the government -- to make deals.
 
The template of the leader is not someone who ensures regulation is diligent and fair, that services are delivered effectively and that the conditions are set for the private sector to create wealth.
 
Instead, the focus is on transactional politics. Sound maintenance is perceived somehow as an inadequate, possibly even undignified goal -- though the report states that its value is often 100 times that of letting a building or road fall apart, and constructing a replacement.
 
The government centre in Port Moresby has become a Valley of the Kings with successions of discarded buildings -- none older than three or four decades -- slowly decaying, though the Pineapple Building that once housed prime ministers is undergoing a welcome return from an archaeological fate.
 
And Asia itself remains something of a mirage, a source of investment but mainly at the margins, in part because compliant "facilitation suppliers", rather than blue-chip companies, were embraced from the start.
 
The models that appear to lure it include Malaysia's Petronas and Singapore's Temasek -- but the odds that these can be replicated in PNG, even if desirable, are long.
 
Europe retains a grip on agricultural and fisheries sales because of its preferential access, ownership of some projects and also because it often dictates in return sustainability and other criteria that add a premium diminishing marketability in Asia.
 
PNG should be inviting the private sector to take part more fully in development, especially of infrastructure. It should be selling infrastructure bonds, too, and privatising its utilities as it did its bank a dozen years ago.
 
As its demographic challenges multiply, it must find new ways to operate, and fresh markets in Asia. The case has been made.

Reply

#2

Interesting how an Aussie publication gets a little testy. The actual article that came out states that if PNG does things right, it's a threat to the Aussies because PNG becomes more aligned with Asia.

PNG's slice of Asia growth

PAPUA New Guinea has been urged to focus on developing its agriculture industries to provide food for the rising Asian market rather than relying on the periodic large resources projects that have marked its history.
A study to be released on Tuesday says export revenue could rise 400 per cent to more than $20 billion by 2030 with more than $100 billion in new investment, if the country can get the development of its resources, infrastructure and agriculture right.
The recommendations mean PNG could be competing with Australia for Asian investment to develop food exports, The Australian Financial Review reports.
The report notes that the country has more under-utilised farmland and water resources than Australia.
The report is the latest in a series by Port Jackson Partners, commissioned by the ANZ Banking Group, that focuses on opportunities for Australian and regional companies from the changing demand patterns in Asia.
"The opportunity for PNG is not just about natural resources. Half of global growth in demand for food will come from Asia over the next 20 years," ANZ Pacific chief executive Vishnu Mohan said in launching the report in PNG's capital, Port Moresby.
The study is being released as PNG expects a massive increase in economic growth in two years as the Exxon LNG project comes on stream, but also potential social problems as construction industry unemployment rises.
It also comes as the government has taken over ownership of one of the earlier major resource projects – the former BHP Billiton-owned Ok Tedi mine – raising questions about its approach to foreign investment.
The Port Jackson Partners report emphasises that the government needs to manage its own funds better, by privatising existing inefficient state-owned companies, if it is going to have the new capital for investment in roads and ports needed for increased exports.
ANZ chief executive Mike Smith said: "Mobilising foreign capital will be critical to realising the opportunity Asia's growth is creating in PNG. ­Capital goes where there is stability and certainty – if PNG can consistently demonstrate this, the potential is enormous."
But Port Moresby Chamber of Commerce chief executive David Conn said the privatisation message needed to be delivered to the government much more forcefully if the country was to meet the report's export projections.
The report urges PNG to look to ­successful African countries such as Botswana for multi-commodity dev­el­op­ment models, and to Asia for long-term export markets, in what could amount to a loosening of long-term ties with Australia just when Australia is seeking assistance for refugee settlement.
It argues that Botswana understood the role that well-planned project infrastructure could have in helping develop neighbouring agriculture industries, which employed more people than resources and provided extra economic stability through the resources price cycle.
It says that while the PNG government has set ambitious targets for infrastructure development, it needs to do more transparent cost-benefit analysis and take advantage of private sector delivery, possibly funded by Asian investors. "The task is to ensure that the critical economic sectors of resources, infrastructure and agriculture all play their role in a national response to the Asian opportunity," the report says.
"Co-ordination of project development and infrastructure, and strategically maximising the spillover effects from sector to sector, can lead to high quality and sustainable growth."
The report cites Canadian research showing PNG is now ranked 73rd by foreign investors as a resource investment location, but could be number three if it reduced land-use restrictions and adopted best-practice development policy settings."

Why so sensitive The Australian? Not liking the idea of PNG stealing your thunder?

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)