Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"We are confident we have enough gas for 2 trains"
#11
good point Getit . Per the call Elk was a seperate compartment which would not be in the results of Antelope Size .
Reply

#12
Getit -

I know what you are saying but am still still sticking to my calculation. Measuring pressures to those resolutions is no mean feat and my calculation certainly depends upon the stated pressure numbers to be within the accuracy of the instruments. A skilled engineer would not report 1,234.567 psi if the gauge had an accuracy of only 1 psi. The fact they are reporting at 0.01 and 0.001 psi resolutions we have to assume they know what they are doing and the gauges are that good.

At this point the biggest challenge to my calc would be if there were water drive involved. Because the pressures at A1 stabilized at 0.08 PSI below their initial value for several hundred hours it doesn't appear water drive, which would tend to push the pressure back up over time, is involved.

By the way, with 10 boe of condensate/mmcf you have an 1.056 mmcfe. So figure my calcs based upon gas flow alone are 7-10% low for E/A as my calcs did not consider condensates which might run 15-20 bbl/mmcf.
Reply

#13
Listen to the call you will hear Elk is a separate compartment CFO speaking I think .
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)