ShareholdersUnite Forums › Companies › InterOil Forum v
Exxon misses

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Exxon misses
ebster123 Offline
Time Will Tell......
*****
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 88
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 109
#1
08-01-2013, 10:08 PM (This post was last modified: 08-01-2013, 10:19 PM by ebster123.)

Exxon earns $1.55 per share in Q2 vs. $1.89 forecast.  Not good, could used a cheap source of LNG in Asia to improve this picture!!!

Website Find
Reply

jft310 Offline
What I Hear.......
*****
Posts: 8,568
Threads: 1,342
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 380
#2
08-01-2013, 10:13 PM
Exxon Board met yesterday.
Website Find
Reply

trans Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 840
Threads: 40
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 181
#3
08-01-2013, 10:13 PM
Analysts say biggest shortfall in XOM results was in Exploration and Production. We know how to pick that area up!
Website Find
Reply

ebster123 Offline
Time Will Tell......
*****
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 88
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 109
#4
08-01-2013, 10:36 PM
Top of page 6 in Exxon's release:
"Natural gas production of 12,278 mcfd decreased 571 mcfd from 2012. Excluding the impacts of entitlement volumes and divestments, natural gas production was down 0.9%, with field decline partly offset by higher demand, lower downtime and project ramp-up."

Seems like a lower cost opportunity would benefit!
Website Find
Reply

Tusker Offline
IOC Elder
*****
Posts: 1,080
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 137
#5
08-02-2013, 12:32 AM

'ebster123' pid='26480' datel Wrote:Top of page 6 in Exxon's release: "Natural gas production of 12,278 mcfd decreased 571 mcfd from 2012. Excluding the impacts of entitlement volumes and divestments, natural gas production was down 0.9%, with field decline partly offset by higher demand, lower downtime and project ramp-up." Seems like a lower cost opportunity would benefit!

Perhaps PNG will be mentioned today in HOU.  28 minutes or so to go.

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

Website Find
Reply

ebster123 Offline
Time Will Tell......
*****
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 88
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 109
#6
08-02-2013, 12:39 AM (This post was last modified: 08-02-2013, 02:12 AM by ebster123.)
I loved the bear raid that just rebounded. Same happened yesterday with a high volume attempt to push lower. I don't like the raids but I like their lack of ability to hold on the dips. Only a matter of time....
Website Find
Reply

Tusker Offline
IOC Elder
*****
Posts: 1,080
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 137
#7
08-02-2013, 01:27 AM

'Tusker' pid='26492' datel Wrote:

'ebster123' pid='26480' datel Wrote:Top of page 6 in Exxon's release: "Natural gas production of 12,278 mcfd decreased 571 mcfd from 2012. Excluding the impacts of entitlement volumes and divestments, natural gas production was down 0.9%, with field decline partly offset by higher demand, lower downtime and project ramp-up." Seems like a lower cost opportunity would benefit!

Perhaps PNG will be mentioned today in HOU.  28 minutes or so to go.

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

"Advancing"

Sure sounds like on the ground to me,

Cheers

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

Website Find
Reply

Spartina Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 689
Threads: 43
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 54
#8
08-02-2013, 01:38 AM (This post was last modified: 08-02-2013, 01:44 AM by Spartina.)
Per Yahoo squeezfinder - IOC just mentioned in their (Exxon's) cc.
Website Find
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: