New bashing SA

[admin]

Just a rehash of Antar's stuff from five years ago.

[Libtardius Maximus]

Nice take down stp.

This is getting comical. We've had four short articles since 75 a share. This last guy decides to back up his generic first version by going full retard with Antar as his source.

I also beleive the more flak we take the closer the target.

[admin]

Yes, why write your own research (like I've been doing with BVSN, and it's still not published, grr..) when one can just rehash a corpse from Antar that was dead on arrival five years ago already..

I think this guy is just after page views from the controversy though. Don't think he's related to anyone.

[Palm]

STP, this guy is little different than the promotors of BVSN that you have been railing. Anyone that doesn't notice the number of people that receive emails from this guy should take note. Wouldn't be too hard to do some surmising as to intentions, but it's all mute. Anyone that takes this guy very seriously gets what they deserve. May make some money ST but most will not. Knowing what we know, this is like reading an old comic strip.

[admin]

Yes, I basically reacted to save SA from people like that, not that I was worried that any five year old Antar story would do any damage.

These guys behind BVSN, that's quite something else and there is real money behind that. It's quite a story, have to say. Incredible it's still going on. By now, everybody knows it's a scam. If you have the opportunity to short I would jump on it, although with volume reaching total float almost daily now, the chances of forced buyin are pretty real.