The Japanese must also build an LNG plant and give IOC 30 percent of the plant for a payment and agree to explore the other prospects to compete with Total . Not likely Total is knocked out could be bought out maybe.
|
Valuation work from IV P3CMS
|
|
12-11-2013, 09:19 PM
12-11-2013, 11:37 PM
Assumptions
Date of Amalysis - Used for Discounting 1-1-2014 Reserve (best case incl liquids) 9,9 Tcfe Discount Rate 10% Ownership/Shares Outstanding Gross working interest Post Net Pre-transation Transaction Working Interest Interoil 75,6% 38,7% 30,0% Total SA 0,0% 61,3% 47,5% Indirect Participation Interests 24,4% 0,0% 22,5% Total 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Working interest IOC after state participation 60,5% IOC Shares Outstanding (millions) incase IPI gets compensated in shares on a proportional basis 48,8 64,6 64,6 Purchase Price (In Millions of Dollars) Nominal Dollars Date Paid Present Value Completion Payment 613,0 31-3-2014 598,9 FID Payment 112,0 30-6-2014 106,9 First LNG Cargo 100,0 30-6-2019 59,2 Interim Resource Payment $0.60/mcfe between 3.5 Tcfe and 5.4 Tcfe 698,7 $0.80/mcfe between 5.4 Tcfe and 6.5 Tcfe 539,4 $1.00/mcfe greater than 6.5 Tcfe 2.083,9 Total Interim Resource Payment 3.321,9 31-12-2015 2.746,1 Final Resource Payment (True-up if needed) - - Discovery Bonus (Only if found) - - Total Purchase Price 4.146,9 3.511,1 NAV-value stake sold to Total as per 1-1-2014 64,2 54,37 NAV-value IOC stake as per 1-1-2014 based on Total taxation 55,34 Asset value IOC stake in PRL 15 before transaction 109,7
12-12-2013, 12:05 AM
Relker where's your LNG work? its at least $1.5 billion in cash flow to IOC for 25 years, each year please include the most important work the LNG plant with 30 percent interest
12-12-2013, 01:33 AM
'jft310' pid='33964' datel Wrote: My take is that there is not a decision taken on a LNG plant. So, I calculated as if we sold the complete stake to Total. I agree with you that there is a lot of upside. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

