Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Opposition claims PNG media 'unfair'
#1

Opposition claims PNG media 'unfair'

http://www.looppng.com/content/oppositio...dia-unfair

This reinforces what you said JFT - - - So-called News in PNG is frequently fabricated when you pay for the media space.

Does the Opposition have the numbers for winning a No Confidence Vote?    DRIVEL I SAY.

ARTICLE BELOW

The country’s media have been criticized for not being balanced in its spreading of information on issues of national importance. Opposition Leader Don Polye claims the media is being “pro Peter O’Neill” and declined to accept paid advertisement and media releases that go against the current government.

He gave an example where both daily newspapers declined to accept the Opposition's paid advertisement and also a statement by two former prime ministers, he claimed, but the same story made headlines in Australia media.

“This is a suppression of freedom of expression, media must not compromise,” Polye said.

Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#2
The media is the media but the only thing this mentions as being paid for (or attempted to pay for) is an advertisement. You always have to pay for an ad; as in this country. "This is a paid political advertisement." The other item is a PR. The Australian media picked up the story.
Reply

#3
Motion of No Confidence Premature - - - EDITORIAL - - - Seems to be a voice of reason and not PAID

http://www.thenational.com.pg/?q=node/96477

Source:
The National, Monday October 19th, 2015

HAS Papua New Guinea gone to the dogs?

The Opposition firmly believes so and has been making moves to topple the three-year-old government of Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.
And yesterday, Opposition Leader Don Polye made the announcement that all opponents and critics of the ruling coalition had been waiting for – to move a motion of no confidence in Prime Minister O’Neill.

The former treasurer, flanked by his predecessor Belden Namah and several MPs, said their aim was to “save the country” from the economic ruin caused by the Government.

He confidently predicted that the Opposition had the numbers to oust O’Neill.

“The current Government is doing all kinds of things damaging and detrimental to the country’s economy because they have done the wrong thing in the first place.”

Namah, who served as Deputy Prime Minister in the first O’Neill Government in 2011-12, said their only objective was to save the country. “We are not removing the ministers, we are removing one person and that is Peter O’Neill.”

It is no secret that the Opposition has been planning to introduce the motion of no confidence in the Prime Minister since the Supreme Court’s ruling in early September that nullified Parliament’s decision to extend the grace period from 18 months to 30 months.

The five-member bench, including Chief Justice Sir Salamo Injia and Deputy Chief Justice Sir Gibbs Salika, had unanimously declared that the constitutional amendments passed by Parliament in 2012 were “unconstitutional and invalid”.

Prime Minister O’Neill had responded, saying the legislation was designed to further enhance the stability in the Government. “We do not want the country to revert back to decades past when governments could be changed every few months. When governments used to change often, growth was undermined and investors stayed away. Political stability is vital for growth and development.”

Whilst the Opposition and the prophets of doom will always be skeptical about the O’Neill Government’s performance and achievements, there is little or no doubt that since the current coalition came into power after the 2012 elections, it has gone in leaps and bounds with innovative initiatives and policies such as free education and free healthcare.

The Government’s list of achievements during its relatively short term in office is astounding, to say the least.
And as the Prime Minister rightly said, Papua New Guinea’s impressive economic growth and progressive developments could not have been achieved without political stability.

The Government meant well in its pursuit for strong economic growth when it convinced Parliament to extend the grace period to 30 months to give itself the buffer to govern without distractions.

Whilst its critics and distractors have argued otherwise, the Government has been able to move the country farther ahead than anyone could have imagined in 2012.

So why is the Opposition hell-bent on ousting O’Neill and changing the government? Do Polye and company really believe that they can rescue the country from the “economic mess” caused by the O’Neill Government? And will the alternate government proposed by the Opposition perform above and beyond O’Neill’s achievements?

These are critical questions that all right-thinking Papua New Guineans must ask about the Opposition’s intended motion of no confidence in Prime Minister O’Neill.

As one of our commentators said, “The threat of a vote of no confidence not only appears to burden a prime minister to be constantly on guard against moves for a change in government but increases the potential to engage in acts of illegality in order to maintain numbers in Parliament.”

Whilst we agree the Opposition’s threat can be destablising among the government ranks, we believe the proposed motion of no confidence is premature.

Despite Polye’s claim that they have the numbers to topple the Government, we understand that O’Neill will be able to comfortably defeat their motion.

Key members of the ruling coalition have reaffirmed their support for the Prime Minister amid unsubstantiated reports of a potential split within the Government.

Nonetheless, the numbers game is on again after a long spell and political horse-trading will be rife around the time the 2015 Emirates Melbourne Cup is run <<< On November 3 >>>
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#4
I'm not pushing that O'Neill is going to be booted. Just showing the the push in on toward the next election. But there is no denying the Opposition is pushing for a vote of no confidence. To ignore it or say any possible "negative"'story is paid for is itself drivel. If that's the case, we should not believe any "positive" story because it also must have been paid for.
Reply

#5
Yes the Opposition has become vocal ... they are now allowed to raise a vote at the upcoming sitting of Parliament.

The Editorial in the National that I posted has both pros and cons and comes to a logical conclusion:

"These are critical questions that all right-thinking Papua New Guineans must ask about the Opposition’s intended motion of no confidence in Prime Minister O’Neill ...
Whilst we agree the Opposition’s threat can be destablising among the government ranks, we believe the proposed motion of no confidence is premature."
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#6
Politics is the same everywhere . Not to much different in the US.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)