May 24, 2013
InterOil Corporation
XOM Partnership Potential
Today, IOC announced it entered into exclusive
negotiations with XOM. A partnership could
provide significant liquidity (gas sale vs.
development JV), de-risk IOC’s resource and
provide resource and project credibility.
Deal on the horizon. The 1.5 year sell-down is
approaching a conclusion as IOC announced it has entered
into exclusive negotiations with Exxon for the sale of gas
that will underpin a 3rd LNG train at XOM’s Konebada site
(new Port Moresby). XOM will carry IOC’s cost to drill
additional delineation wells in Elk Antelope to determine
XOM’s interest in PRL 15. Further, IOC will have the option
to pursue development of a second LNG train in Gulf
Province (likely 3.8TCFE) with XOM. Gas supporting the
Gulf train will either source from PRL 15 and/or Triceratops,
based upon results of Elk Antelope delineation drilling and
further Triceratops exploration (with PRE).
SuperMajor credibility. If a deal occurs after protracted
due diligence and negotiations, a partnership with Exxon,
one of the largest upstream operators in the world and the
largest operator in PNG, could dispel prevalent resource
and execution skepticism, in our view. With a new CEO
and the potential for a new XOM partnership, we believe
IOC could become a mainstream energy company with
clear parallels to Oil Search.
Significant liquidity event. The contemplated gas sale
vs. an LNG JV, could provide IOC with significant liquidity to
fund shareholder distributions, additional exploration and
future developments. Based upon the size of XOM’s
existing LNG trains under construction in PNG
(3.45MMTPA), we believe at least 4Tcfe of dry gas could be
sold by IOC to XOM. Terms are not final and exclusive
negotiations continue with price per mcfe and payments
structure necessary to value the sale (NPV). It is unclear
whether condensate volumes, which will be stripped in the
field as XOM pipes dry gas from the Hides for the PNGLNG
project, could be included in a sale. The 2C condensate
estimate for Elk/Antelope is 143MM bbls or 61MMbbls,
proportionally allocated in a 4Tcfe sale. This is an
additional element of consideration or potential value.
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
05-25-2013, 03:50 AM
05-25-2013, 04:03 AM
Thanks Gatorama. And we await GS coverage.
05-25-2013, 04:05 AM
What does this mean!?
"XOM will carry IOC’s cost to drill additional delineation wells in Elk Antelope to determine XOM’s interest in PRL 15."
05-25-2013, 04:10 AM
Very nice Gator. Thanks!
One person says XOM will front IOC $1 Billion to drill the other 3 PRL 15 prospects and the rest of E/A. And front them a % of the pipeline costs plus buy NG. IOC can independently develop their own LNG if they chose. Phils problem may have been his price expectations..
05-25-2013, 04:21 AM
"If a deal occurs after protracted due diligence and negotiations". Is this what the market is grasping? Philstar says it is a done deal with just some paperwork needing signed.
L Ron Rules!
05-25-2013, 04:30 AM
"Clear parallels to oil search". IOC has twice the resources of OSH but < half the market cap
05-25-2013, 05:31 AM
'Petro2458' pid='23021' datel Wrote:What does this mean!? "XOM will carry IOC’s cost to drill additional delineation wells in Elk Antelope to determine XOM’s interest in PRL 15." My take is that a function of the delineation wells is to determine what percentage of Elk Altelope XOM gets in order to provide the gas they need for an additional train. It looks like they may have agreed on the price for the gas for one train, but haven't yet agreed on the percentage of Elk Antelope.
05-25-2013, 05:31 AM
Exactly Petro. This news today was tip of iceberg. Oneill let one of many cats out of bag before IOC totally ready. Much more to come. See JFT's comments above.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

