Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
JFT Consortium
#11
I think you should let him in. What are you afraid of?

Besides, if he proves disruptive you can always kick him off.
Reply

#12

'sfiaes' pid='25409' datel Wrote:I think you should let him in. What are you afraid of? Besides, if he proves disruptive you can always kick him off.

I already answered that, there wasn't any support for that proposal, and since one can read and discuss with him elsewhere, it's not terribly important either.

Reply

#13
"What are you afraid of?"


"you" refers collectively to the voting members of SHU, not just yourself.
Reply

#14

'admin' pid='25410' dateline='<a href="tel:1373299 Wrote:

'sfiaes' pid='25409' dateline='<a href="tel:1373299 Wrote:I think you should let him in. What are you afraid of? Besides, if he proves disruptive you can always kick him off.

I already answered that, there wasn't any support for that proposal, and since one can read and discuss with him elsewhere, it's not terribly important either.

That's right. He should not be allowed to post his msg on this board. I've been IOC holder since 2005, and noticed so many biased, fraudelent messages from these(maybe one, I am not sure) people. IMHO, they spread too many un-true stories, and hurting so many innocent investors. SHU is far better than Yazoo because of this kind of filtering, I believe.

Reply

#15
Perhaps I jumped on a small bandwagon. I thought there was a current push to have Bonk on SHU.
STP clarified theat there is NO push for that.
I vote we close this issue
I vote for positive news this week.
Reply

#16
I wonder if the JFT Consortium signed the NDA's peddled by IOC management on their way to Asia???
Reply

#17
We declined the offer made by mgt.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)