Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Morgan Stanley Released, But Not The Other Investment Banks
#11

'Petrovale' pid='32268' datel Wrote:UBS released too
if you can say, when did ubs become unrestricted?

Reply

#12

'j4j' pid='32273' datel Wrote:

'Petrovale' pid='32268' datel Wrote:UBS released too
if you can say, when did ubs become unrestricted?

My apologies, that was not UBS, but Citi and MS

Reply

#13

'Petrovale' pid='32275' datel Wrote:

'j4j' pid='32273' datel Wrote:

'Petrovale' pid='32268' datel Wrote:UBS released too
if you can say, when did ubs become unrestricted?

My apologies, that was not UBS, but Citi and MS

thanks.  but that begs another question.  i did not know that citi was ever restricted on ioc.

Reply

#14

[/quote]thanks.  but that begs another question.  i did not know that citi was ever restricted on ioc.

[/quote]

Citi wasn't restricted. It just reports extensively on OSH, as does CSFB.

Reply

#15
Another interpretation is that Hession let go MS simply because he was no longer in need of their services ...for whatever reason. There's nothing to preclude UBS or any other bank from finishing the deal(s) is there?.

As I recall it was the June 2012 Spinnaker AGM where Colin said they had broken the world into three sections, assigning an IB to each. That was a very, very, very long time ago.
Reply

#16
It is my understanding that Dr Hession and his team are now wrapping up the deal or deals without further involvement of the IBs. It may be that the different IBs may have different policies and timeframes regarding when they can resume coverage or how soon the analysts might be willing or able to do that.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)