Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mulacek's Rocket
#1

 “enhanced procedures for reporting reserves and discoveries”.

Seriously. What is this exactly?  JFT already does this!

Phil's actions only make sense if he's sniffed 'sinister'.

Mulacek moves on InterOil board


INTEROIL founder and one of its largest single shareholders, Phil Mulacek, has launched a rocket at the Papua New Guinea-focused company’s board, demanding that the company cut the number of directors on the board from and limit compensation.

Antelope-5.

Mulacek, who used to lead InterOil as CEO, wants to limit total cash compensation for all directors to $600,000 annually to "better align the interests of the directors with the interests of the shareholders".

He has also proposed the company should also require at least 50% of directors’ total compensation be equity-based, a regulatory filing stated. Those shares would be escrowed for the time they are directors of the company, plus 12 months.

Mulacek, who retired from the company in 2013 amid speculation he was pushed, has further called that around one-third of directors should have technical expertise in the oil business, and the company should adopt “enhanced procedures for reporting reserves and discoveries”.

Claiming to own 5.1% of InterOil, Mulacek also wants to nominate one or more candidates to the board, suggesting he once again wants to exert control over the takeover target.

InterOil is now led by former Woodside Petroleum LNG executive Michael Hession.

Among Mulacek’s other demands, seemingly anticipating an offer from a likely suitor, such as Woodside, ExxonMobil or Total, is a rule prohibiting executive officers from receiving payment in connection with a change-in-control transaction unless the bid is above $C60 per share, around double where the company is trading now.

His proposed rule would also require that the company is trading well above the share price when the executive started their employment.

Also on the table is a demand that the company revise its reserves reporting and discovery declaration rules, a move that comes ahead of what could be a significant payday from Total.

A poison pill would also require shareholders get a vote on significant acquisitions and dispositions, defined as any asset with a market value greater than 10% of the book value of the company.

In response to the Mulacek Group’s bid, InterOil said it was reviewing the requisition and accompanying proposals and would respond in due course.

The junior said it had engaged in “extensive interactions” with is shareholders over the past year, during which time its shares have halved, along with much of the oil patch, and it said it would “take actions that it believes are in the best interest of InterOil and all of its shareholders”.

The New York-listed, Singapore-based company is widely tipped to be swallowed up before the Papua LNG project is sanctioned, with Woodside one of the major players in any battle, considering it was recently rebuffed by Oil Search in an $11.6 billion takeover approach.

It is widely believed that if Woodside were to make a bid that could trigger counter-offers from Total, which operates Papua LNG, or ExxonMobil, operator of PNG LNG.

Recent drilling on the flanks of the Antelope field have surprised on the upside and extended flow tests have confirmed connectivity, deliverability and excellent reservoir quality across Antelope, which should mean a less complex and lower cost development.

The results of the appraisal program will be submitted to two independent auditors for certification, a process which could take four to six months.

Total would then be required to pay out an estimated $US580 million ($A780 million) once the independent reserves report on Elk-Antelope is lodged.

Further, the market continues to speculate that Oil Search and InterOil have been in conversations about a potential merger.

InterOil’s major asset is an interest in the Elk-Antelope fields, the backbone of the proposed Papua LNG project, and the undeveloped fields.

Elk-Antelope has resources at Elk-Antelope of around 7.1 trillion cubic feet plus liquids (1C), enough to support a two train development, plus a further 6Tcf is its other discoveries such as Triceratops, Raptor and Bobcat.

InterOil’s market cap is around $1.46 billion, and the company expects to spend around $155 million this year, from current liquidity of $252 million in cash and undrawn sources.

InterOil will hold its annual general meeting on June 14.

Reply

#2
Great stuff Treeman !!!
Reply

#3

'jft310' pid='67988' datel Wrote:Great stuff Treeman !!!

Yea, let me second that. Very interesting..

Reply

#4
Is it humanly possible for any article to use a figure higher than 7.1tcf for Elk/Antelope? Hasn't Interoil publicly stated the "Best" estimate is far higher than that, and that was before the drilling "surprises on the upside."
Reply

#5

I found these notes on p.12 of the citi report from October noteworthy:

The 5.4Tcfe OSH estimate did not assume gas in flanks of structure: We
understand that the key difference between the 5.4Tcfe 2C reported by OSH and
the 7.1Tcfe 2C reported by InterOil from auditor GCA was due to OSH not
including gas in the southern flank of the Antelope structure, despite being
mapped on seismic as above the gas-water contact. Drilling of Antelope-4 has
demonstrated the extension of gas into the southern flank, and from discussions
with OSH we understand its view on resource has subsequently increased
towards IOC estimates.
We also understand that volumes from the Elk field, adjacent to Antelope, are not
included in the recent GCA 7.1Tcfe 2C Contingent Resource estimate for Antelope,
but could contribute up to 300+Bcf gross to certified reserves.

'Movieguy' pid='67993' datel Wrote:Is it humanly possible for any article to use a figure higher than 7.1tcf for Elk/Antelope? Hasn't Interoil publicly stated the "Best" estimate is far higher than that, and that was before the drilling "surprises on the upside."

Reply

#6
Indeed that is very helpful, thanks Digger.
Reply

#7
Digger this is exactly what I have stated . GCA would not give credit for an undrilled well for assets . Appears Citi figured out what I figured out which requires input from the GCA document copy or a friendly person who can tell you what's in the report .
Reply

#8
When did writers start citing 1C estimates or was that a misprint? The article posted by Tree to start this thread cited an Antelope 1C estimate of 7.1 TCF. This may have been the first time I've seen an article citing 1C information by itself rather than along with 2C and 3C. Since our reserves payment is to be based on 2C the more appropriate number would be GLC's new 2C of 10.2 TCFe per slide 4 of the March 30, 2016 Q4 presentation. (The writer did use the 2C for TBR.)
Reply

#9
Exxon only pays on P-1, using P-2 we have enough for our 2 train like Exxon's or could share extra gas with Exxon and still build a copy cat plant .
Reply

#10
"Exxon only pays on P-1, using P-2 we have enough for our 2 train like Exxon's or could share extra gas with Exxon and still build a copy cat plant."

JFT: Please provide something that shows your above statement to be true.
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)