'weaselpuppy' pid='71997' datel Wrote:If this situation with the OSH ADRs becomes an issue, yes I believe there will be a lot of selling pressure. The upward pressure from now to Deal Vote will be the valuation of the CVRs from any leaked OSH-IPI cert info, and rumblings of a sweetener or new bidder. The sweetener possiblity may be affected by how the AGM goes next week. Hold on to your hats. My focus now is to look at the behavior of the MF/Institutions holding 100's of thousands or millions of shares, to see if they think this ADR situation is a problem. I mean if Cap Re is okeedoke with the deal, they have to have thought about how they will unwind 40+ million shares of OSH at some point, right? Maybe they aren't restricted like individuals are? Hmmm....so many unanswered questions. Thanks IOC IR!!!
'Puppy, don't be frightened by some of the noisy dogs of war. US brokers can trade "ordinaries" on foreign exchanges for higher commissions than what is charged for trades on US exchanges. If I recall correctly, Kaliboo told us a while back that Fidelity has a flat $80 charge for X shares, which presumably would be scaled for volume. It is not necessary to trade in ADRs.
The funds trade around the world. They know how to move their volumes without badly hurting their positions unless the fund itself is under duress. But I would not assume that funds are poised to dump OSH shares. If commodties have an upward move, the AUD should strengthen as would the several ASX indices of which OSH is a part, as would OSH itself. I think I am correct in saying that we have yet to see the name of any fund holding IOC which would be forced to sell because its charter would not permit non-USD holdings.
The CVR is a different proposition because of the tax question for a US taxpayer. I don't see how OSH can give any information about listing the CVR before the deal is done. So we would have to wait, just as we have been waiting for a very long time for "monetizing assets", deal or no deal. fwiw
katytrader

