Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shell CC Transcript on IOC
#1

Compliments of a friend.  His comment was 'this is a really big answer to a question that could have been brushed off.'
We do know the press article noting Shell/IOC negotiations preceded the CC by 3 hrs.  The article was bolder and the CC answer defers to PNG Gov't as the entity Shell is courting more so than ennerOle.  
**********
Martijn Rats - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
Hi, it's Martijn Rats at Morgan Stanley. The last time we were in this room, we all had a lot of questions why the dividend didn't go up more than it
went, and I think it is fair to say you expressed some caution and conservatism. Now we're having a quarter where Simon runs us through a list of
a few things that sort of seem to have gone against the results. And it sort of makes you wonder whether sort of back six months ago, you were
already thinking about perhaps some specific things that you might need to face during the year where you might really think about -- there is
always something that we need to anticipate.
I was just wondering if sort of in retrospect you can sort of comment on how that discussion went and how you see sort of that specific aspect
going forward?
Also with that I have one more smaller question. There seems to be a few headlines on discussions with InterOil in Papua New Guinea. I was
wondering if you could elaborate on that?
 
Peter Voser - Royal Dutch Shell Plc. - CEO
Yes, okay. I think, as it is dividend, they both go to Simon, but let me also just say something from here both in the Board -- the discussions with
the Board are very simple. They are on dividends. They are long-term and we have a policy and we take a long-term view. So short-time macroeconomic
assumptions do normally not play a big role because we really take long-term views.
But it is true when we had the first quarter, I was not very optimistic on the economy and I was very clear that I see the world going into a slowdown
and that has happened.
Now on your second point, which is do you foresee some changes over time? No, we don't. But we also emphasize in a very strong rate quarterly
results and Simon said in his part, there is snapshot and we have this interesting situation with this dividend from this LNG joint venture. If that
comes in two days earlier or later, does it really matter to us? No, but you can have a big miss in the market and that could be a problem.
So I think where I sit, I take a through the quarter view, a long-term view, but from an operational performance point of view clearly. Every month
the results need to be delivered, but I can tell you if you have got more security issues in Nigeria, our production can go more up and down and
that can wipe out growth and that is actually not what I want to talk with shareholders. I want to talk how we actually deliver the value in the long
term.
Over to you on Papua New Guinea and the rest of the dividend.
 
Simon Henry - Royal Dutch Shell Plc. - CFO
There is probably only one thing to add to the dividend. While we don't let the macro drive it entirely, we did have some concerns about where
the macro might go six months ago. Peter was on record saying exactly that, sometime in June, I think. Three days later, the price dropped $20 to
90, so we thought if it stays there, dividend will be off the discussion. So I think the market is more concerned about that linkage than we might
be.
PNG; there is gas, there is an intent for LNG projects from the government. The government we have been talking to for a couple of years now.
They announced last year that we were a preferred partner because of the capability they want to bring into the country, large project developers,
people who can develop markets and local capability. So yes, we've had discussions with PNG government. We've had discussions with InterOil
from time to time.
And I can't say too much about where those discussions are at the moment. Yes, we are interested in a project. Yes, it must meet exactly the criteria
that Peter laid out to compete with other LNG options.
We don't actually know yet whether that will be the case. There is a new government election process in progress at that moment in the country.
As they come out of that, confirmation of fiscal opportunity and where InterOil fits and the government thinking will enable potentially a project
to go ahead there. It's very difficult for us to say more because it is still quite uncertain at the moment.
It's an attractive play and the same effective geological trend that we are in in Australia and now in Indonesia, so it is one we think we can add a
lot of value to provided the other conditions are right.
Peter
Reply

#2
Thanks, Tree.

My take is that Shell is definitely a player here. The comments about the election provide the time frame for serious beetle nut cracking.

Ask this question: What one single development would most put the NEW PNG government in a favorable domestic and international light? Yep, it is the conclusion of negotiations over the 2nd LNG project for the country. This is so important, I'm sure the PNG leaders will figure out that the DPE/Duma nonsense cannot be allowed to rear its ugly head again. That's why Duma is most likely OUT.

The new government can hit the ground running by swiftly coming to agreement on the Gulf project. Still, I suspect it'll be later, later, rather than sooner -- i.e. no sooner than late September/early October. That's not to say there couldn't be something highly significant coming out sooner -- 2Q CC? -- on T-2.

VS
Reply

#3
Exxon will not allow Shell to win. Exxon has way more to gain here
Reply

#4
I think if you focus on especially Simon's comments he makes some very interesting comments:
1. "They announced last year that we were a preferred partner because of the capability they want to bring into the country, large project developers,
people who can develop markets and local capability." "A" preferred partner which is interesting. We have been hearing through Post Courier that Shell is 'THE" preferred partner which didn't make sense given Exxon, Japex, Mitsui, etc involvement in the country. Now the government (Duma) has said that Shell is THE preferred partner on the IOC project, but was that Duma trying to ram Shell down IOC's throat or is the government really open to others being involved with IOC? Simon's comments seem to indicate that they realize that they are "A" preferred partner in this project, but it's not a given.
2. As Value says this appears to indicate that discussions are ongoing, and (as we know) very dependent on the election outcome. Which all indicates "later" rather than sooner.
3. IOC has the gas and PNG is seen to be on par with both Australia and Indonesia. This is huge as it confirms how importatnt PNG is in general and IOC must be in particular with its large reefs and wet gas. It is a jewel that SMs want. Seems he might have mentioned Africa, Canada, etc. due to recent activity as far as type of plays, but he mentions Australia and Indonesia. Very telling I think. In June, Shell announced it will be investing $20 billion in Indonesia in the Abadi offshore LNG project. That's major. (http://www.breakbulk.com/oil-gas/shell-i...-lng-06-11). We know what they have going in Australia. That's major. They want similar things in PNG. That's major
4. We should expect that they are being very aggressive in the PRL 15 discussions; they want it. We should also expect Exxon to be equally or more aggressive due to their existing project and needs. If Shell does not get PRL 15, we should expect that they will be VERY aggressive in the rest of IOC's license areas. That's major.
5. If need be Shell WILL initaiate a bidding war to buy all of IOC. That's major.

Life is good.
Reply

#5
Palm has this figured out.IMHO
Reply

#6

'jft310' pid='7337' datel Wrote:Palm has this figured out.IMHO

Thanks jft; let's hope so.  And if it is correct we should keep looking for opportunities to buy more with confidence. $84.05 was the old high and now new support.  We shouldn't see much of a big dip from here, but it's happened before.  If it does, Cramer would say "BUY BUY BUY".  In this case he'd be right on.

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)