09-29-2012, 12:54 PM
Thanks Pet, the fun already starts before the drilling has begun. A quick question. Where you argue that Antelope 3 will have a similar gas column of Ant1 (which is rather massive) but the better (average) rock quality of Ant2, if that were to pan out, would the numbers (even of gas in place) not increase? Or is it that this is what the evaluators also expect, implicitly?
Ant1 had 2277ft of net pay and average porosity of 8.8% while Ant2 had 1175ft of net pay but an average porosity of 14%. Having an Ant3 of 2000ft+ net pay and average porosity of 14% or so seems, well, rather massive..
Where ever I read about wells, they rarely have these kind of metrics.
Ant1 had 2277ft of net pay and average porosity of 8.8% while Ant2 had 1175ft of net pay but an average porosity of 14%. Having an Ant3 of 2000ft+ net pay and average porosity of 14% or so seems, well, rather massive..
Where ever I read about wells, they rarely have these kind of metrics.