Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Liedership by the Panderer in Chief
#30

'admin' pid='11094' datel Wrote:

Tree, I'm a little confused here. I don't really know what happened at the embassy (and could it be that the State Dept. didn't know either, at least not immediately? Are they not dependent on the very same embassy for info?), but what seems reasonable to assume is:

  • There was a video.
  • There were violent protests, in many countries, not just Libya
  • There were budget cuts to embassy safety

On the latter:

For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.

How it it that if the Administration request funds for security which are denied by Republican lawmakers, the latter nevertheless blames the former? It could very well be the Administration made some mistakes, but should't those in favor of these rather specific budget cuts at least share some of the blame?

Now, I'm aware that the security guy at the embassy claims he made several requests for more security. He won't have been the only one.

However, budgets tend to be limited, especially those that are curtailed. Awkward trade-offs ensue, and only perfect foresight would enable an allocator of funds to make perfect decisions. Without perfect foresight, errors will be made and some of these errors have much bigger consequences than others, unfortunately.

I'm a litle confused STP.  There is plenty of money for security.  Arming our guys with bullets may help.  Changing the rules of engagement to allow our guys to defend themselves may help.  Identifying the threats and acting  accordingly takes adult leadership.  It's a tough sell to lay fault on lack of security priorities on Republicans.  Sometimes the answer isn't wasting more money it is identifying threats and preparing accordingly.

Are we trying to prove what we beleive or are we seeking the truth?  All need to open their eyes.

All can learn from Laura Logan and her realization that the administration is either ignorantly underestimating the threats or is lying about the threats.

Take 20 mins and watch.  At least watch from 18:to to the end.

http://sheikyermami.com/2012/10/10/lara-logans-speech/

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-10-2012, 09:54 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-10-2012, 11:35 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-11-2012, 12:27 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:14 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:15 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:42 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 03:54 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 07:31 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 04:20 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 09:10 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 11:05 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 01:20 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-13-2012, 12:36 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 01:13 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 02:38 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:15 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:33 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:53 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 04:40 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 05:30 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 06:55 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-24-2012, 09:39 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-24-2012, 10:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)