Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Liedership by the Panderer in Chief
#31
And the other part of that STP is that when the issue you pointed out about funding cuts was made yesterday it was almost in passing. Why's that? Because the answer was subsequently given that when asked the administration stated that there was adequate staffing in place based on the administration's assessment of the situation. Had they really listened to those present in Libya, as Tree says, additional forces could have been provided. Instead they wanted to rely on Libyan police and military whom they were working with. Seems as though Iraq and Afghanistan should serve as examples of how much we can trust these people. They will turn on us in an instant. It's no secret; they hate us. Why is this such a surprise? They don't forget who took out Bin Laden. Recently these groups had people carrying signs and yelling, "Obama, we are all Osamas". In othe words, "Come and get us, we all hate America as much as Osama Bin Laden". We are fools to think, act or react otherwise. Yes there were protests elsewhere, but just as Libya was planned, so were the rest. That film may hav added fuel, but Al Quaida is sending a message, "We are reorganizing, and we are going back into Iraq now that you are gone."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world...q/1623297/

And just a few hours ago in Yemen:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-5753...sy-killed/

They use the excuse of the film, but that's smoke. They know Obama has made his choice and I believe Russia is part of the reason for that. Since Russia just recently joined the World Trade Organization, they are forcing our hand. Hillary was in Russia about the same time as oneill and PNG. The US wants Russia to be a buffer with China. You know Russia has been trying to get the US to back off in the ME. We all play nice and Russia will sin some trade agreements. You might say someone's balls are being tightly squeezed by Putin. No coincidence he's back in power.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/1...GJ20121011
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-10-2012, 09:54 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-10-2012, 11:35 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-11-2012, 12:27 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:14 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:15 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-11-2012, 05:42 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 03:54 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 07:31 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 04:20 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-12-2012, 09:10 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 11:05 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-12-2012, 01:20 PM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-13-2012, 12:36 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 01:13 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 02:38 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:15 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:33 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 03:53 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 04:40 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 05:30 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Palm - 10-13-2012, 06:55 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-24-2012, 09:39 AM
RE: Liedership by the Panderer in Chief - by Tree - 10-24-2012, 10:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)