10-30-2012, 07:22 AM
This has nothing to do with what label is applied to a terrorist attack on a US Embassy, security funding, repubs/dems or conservatives, an impossible expectation of a president to keep 100% Americans safe, why Romney left Lybia to the moderator, the press and Senator's and Reps to investigate. It is all about what was said, when it was said and who said it STP. It's about an immediate blame of the attack on a video which later is proven to be 100% a lie based upon live drone video feed and on ground reports. The question is why the hoax? I guess some may refuse to connect the dots and deny any conclusion can be reached. I'm gobsmacked (to use Henry's term) that anyone looking at Obama's own words, the word's of his surrogates in context of timeline and known facts could not be as outraged as Pat Cadell. He of all observers has no anti-Obama agenda.
So now we have Obama saying he immediately ordered done whatever was required to keep those in the embassy safe. Nothing was done. So it's either Obama never ordered such or those he ordered didn't follow through. The CIA ex-SEAL guys on the ground were told to 'stand down' a few times, heroically dis-obeyed the order and saved 27 or so Americans. They were laser targeting the terrorist mortar encampment which was attacking the CIA compound when they were killed by a mortar explosion. By laser targeting their enemy, they exposed their location which resulted in their deaths. The only reason they would laser target a hostile location is because they expected air support would eliminate the threat. The ex-SEALS, must have known there was armed air support orbiting above. To assume otherwise is foolish. Since these heroes died is there any conclusion that can be arrived at besides the air support was ordered to not engage? The CIA said they didn't tell the CIA-SEALS to stand down, so who did? Likely the same guy that told the air support to do the same. It was either Obama policy or some general somewhere which dis-obeyed a direct order from the Commander in Chief. Your choice.
So now we have Obama saying he immediately ordered done whatever was required to keep those in the embassy safe. Nothing was done. So it's either Obama never ordered such or those he ordered didn't follow through. The CIA ex-SEAL guys on the ground were told to 'stand down' a few times, heroically dis-obeyed the order and saved 27 or so Americans. They were laser targeting the terrorist mortar encampment which was attacking the CIA compound when they were killed by a mortar explosion. By laser targeting their enemy, they exposed their location which resulted in their deaths. The only reason they would laser target a hostile location is because they expected air support would eliminate the threat. The ex-SEALS, must have known there was armed air support orbiting above. To assume otherwise is foolish. Since these heroes died is there any conclusion that can be arrived at besides the air support was ordered to not engage? The CIA said they didn't tell the CIA-SEALS to stand down, so who did? Likely the same guy that told the air support to do the same. It was either Obama policy or some general somewhere which dis-obeyed a direct order from the Commander in Chief. Your choice.