Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
new SA article by Resourcearb
#6
"I don't know what "fair" is necessarily but I get the impression anything under $150 would not get serious consideration"

ebster, you may very well be right. I agree, $150 is low relative to the true value of the resource. I simply don't have a good feel for what $$$ would be sufficient to get the approval of large shareholders/board. I only sense anything under $150 would not get approved. Yes, I often wonder why a SM has not swooped in to buy this resource. If appears the probability is high there are at least 20 Trillion cf and liquids. That would be a needle mover. $300 would indeed be a steal!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
new SA article by Resourcearb - by freddiekingman - 12-26-2012, 06:11 PM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by Tree - 12-26-2012, 10:02 PM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by Palm - 12-26-2012, 11:59 PM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by ltinvest - 12-27-2012, 12:04 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by ebster123 - 12-27-2012, 12:33 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by ltinvest - 12-27-2012, 12:59 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by ebster123 - 12-27-2012, 01:02 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by sfiaes - 12-27-2012, 02:08 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by Tree - 12-27-2012, 02:15 AM
RE: new SA article by Resourcearb - by Putncalls - 12-27-2012, 10:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)