01-25-2013, 02:56 AM
'Palm' pid='16480' datel Wrote:Hmmmm not bad Treedaddy, not bad at all. Only chnages have turned out to be very good; more bidders and likely higher bids with Ant3 in the pocket. Need more time fellas. No problem, just be sure you are really serious by Feb 28th.
Good developments have a way of slowing down EnnerOle. An Elder in Chicago is more geeked about those porosity #s than the bid deadline. Ant-3 = best well to date. What do those porosity #s do to the conservative recovery factors GLJ used in determining T-count? I'd imagine bidders will assume different recovery rates, all it takes is 1 SM to assume recovery rates are velly good.

