|
J P Morgan
|
02-06-2013, 04:46 AM
It's a filing by the NY office and its an aggregated holding. Note that in item 5 the box is not checked. If it were it would mean these shares are being held for the benefit of one person who holds more than 5%. Tough to tell how many investors this represents. But as Maui pointed out it is up from 3%+ in the Oct filing.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 02:44 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by MRP - 02-06-2013, 02:48 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Libtardius Maximus - 02-06-2013, 02:57 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Palm - 02-06-2013, 02:59 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by trans - 02-06-2013, 03:08 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Palm - 02-06-2013, 03:17 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by ltinvest - 02-06-2013, 04:02 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Libtardius Maximus - 02-06-2013, 04:22 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 04:42 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by cybersssss - 02-06-2013, 04:45 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 05:15 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Palm - 02-06-2013, 04:46 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 05:04 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Poman - 02-06-2013, 05:00 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by jft310 - 02-06-2013, 05:06 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Poman - 02-06-2013, 05:11 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by TomCrooz - 02-06-2013, 07:28 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 08:30 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Palm - 02-06-2013, 05:12 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 05:22 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Palm - 02-06-2013, 05:31 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 06:18 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Poman - 02-06-2013, 05:33 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Relker - 02-06-2013, 05:39 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Ass0ciatedPress - 02-06-2013, 06:17 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Getitrt2 - 02-06-2013, 06:38 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Gator - 02-06-2013, 06:32 AM
RE: J P Morgan - by Relker - 02-06-2013, 06:56 PM
RE: J P Morgan - by johnwgrant - 02-06-2013, 10:20 PM
RE: J P Morgan - by jft310 - 02-06-2013, 11:34 PM
|
