Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mythical "Short Squeeze" about to visit IOC land ?
#3
The shorts, or those that matter, clearly expect a bad deal (low price) and/or a deal full of contingencies, so that they can claim it's not really a deal at all.

I think they need both to get their "get out of jail" card.

If they get a bad deal with few contingencies, the whole narrative that IOC doesn't have what it says, is about to bust etc. etc. falls apart, and there will be a project, derisking much of the stock (unless the deal is sub 50cents/mcf, but I don't expect that).

If there is a good deal with contingencies, they'll short on hope. Hope that these contingencies will not be met, while the signing of the deal clearly shows intent. Good luck to that. I would say in this case, there are better shorts out there, but that's just me.

We're off to the races if we get a good deal with few contingencies. They clearly don't expect that.

Then there is the take-over "risk"

Having seen people throw all sorts of stuff lately, I think if you ask them now, is InterOil a good short candidate, most of them would answer no in an honest moment.

Too bad many of them don't seem to have many of these honest moments..
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Mythical "Short Squeeze" about to visit IOC land ? - by admin - 03-07-2013, 04:05 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)