Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WWW (While We Wait) !!!
#5

I could be wrong, but regarding number 5...it's a very good question and could be a delay item. So...I believe that the negotiations over last several months have already structured the equity ownership that each company type could submit a binding bid for. This way, IOC could select a combination of partners. It would seem that XOM for example could submit a bid for 20% and for 30%. And a potential non-operated partner could bid for 10%. This would allow IOC to either pick 1 partner for 30% or 2 partners for 30%. I'd like to think all the time that has passed was ensuring binding bids were in a form such that IOC would not have to revert with structural equity changes to the bidders.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by johnwgrant - 03-10-2013, 01:24 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by dorr9352 - 03-10-2013, 02:03 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by jft310 - 03-10-2013, 02:07 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Palm - 03-10-2013, 02:16 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Petro2458 - 03-10-2013, 02:29 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Petro2458 - 03-10-2013, 02:37 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Palm - 03-10-2013, 02:58 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by jft310 - 03-10-2013, 02:58 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by ArtM72 - 03-10-2013, 04:05 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Petro2458 - 03-10-2013, 07:07 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by jft310 - 03-10-2013, 09:30 PM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Palm - 03-10-2013, 10:52 PM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Tree - 03-11-2013, 08:58 AM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by Stavros - 03-10-2013, 10:15 PM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by jft310 - 03-10-2013, 10:43 PM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by admin - 03-10-2013, 11:39 PM
RE: WWW (While We Wait) !!! - by cybersssss - 03-10-2013, 11:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)