Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Phil's Elk 3 coments
#2

'sageo' pid='20205' datel Wrote:

Pet 1  or Petro - Good am,gentlemen . Would either of you have time today to expand on Phil's coments today about Elk 3? Such as "if  E 3 hit a big commercial payload" and "we will test the lower porosity section in the Elk reservoir" . Sounds like we are going deeper than other Elk wells and looking for more "goodies". Thanks guys!

Pet  - I just read your reply to Art . Answers my questions !! Thanks much.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Phil's Elk 3 coments - by sageo - 04-06-2013, 01:06 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by sageo - 04-06-2013, 01:30 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by petrengr1 - 04-06-2013, 01:42 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by sageo - 04-06-2013, 02:20 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by Getitrt2 - 04-06-2013, 03:03 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by Spartina - 04-06-2013, 04:20 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by Palm - 04-06-2013, 04:37 AM
RE: Phil's Elk 3 coments - by jft310 - 04-07-2013, 12:42 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)