04-10-2013, 11:11 PM
Gefrvert may claim that he writes 100% of his articles, but how hard is it to cut and paste info that is fed to you into an article? Obviously not hard. At times he's stated that he is "unaware" of a fact he is confronted with which contradicts something he says. Likely because he does little real research/DD. This shows that his future as any kind of financial analyst is very dim. Westlake took the time to go to the source; Fuller Foundation and it didn't take them long to get the answers. Gefvert feeds his spoonfed info to a reporter and says, "Go get 'em", or he contacts someone with no knowledge of the situation at Calvin and because she can't give any real answer, he paints it as negative.
Impressive