Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PPL338 Joint Venture
#13

The "nine block" limit falls under the definition of a "Location".  The O&G Act states that a location cannot contain more than 9 blocks.  Then under Sec 37 in describing the PRL application process for someone with a PPL, it states:

(1) A licensee whose petroleum prospecting licence is in force in respect of the blocks that constitute a location may, within two years after the date on which the blocks were declared to be a location, or such further period as the Minister allows, make application to the Director for the grant of a petroleum retention licence in respect of such of the blocks as the licensee satisfies the Minister contain a gas field or a part of a gas field or, for the better administration of petroleum activities, should be included in a petroleum retention licence.

(2) A licensee may, during the term of a petroleum prospecting licence, make application to the Director for a petroleum retention licence in respect of any block or blocks within the licence area—

(a) that he satisfies the Minister contains or contain a gas field or part of a gas field, or, for the better administration of petroleum activities, should be included in a petroleum retention licence; and

(b) that do not at the time of making the application constitute a location."

So I believe they would not be limited to the 9 blocks per (2).  It would be interesting to know which blocks make up those included in the "Location" granted to Tri/Bwata.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
PPL338 Joint Venture - by tarulestheday - 05-15-2013, 04:28 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 04:51 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:12 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by davidhmtk - 05-15-2013, 04:56 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-15-2013, 05:20 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:21 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:26 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-15-2013, 05:29 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-15-2013, 07:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Spartina - 05-15-2013, 06:48 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 01:31 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:08 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:16 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 02:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:44 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:50 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 02:38 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 08:27 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:04 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:39 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 05:37 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 05:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 07:00 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 12:50 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 09:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 09:47 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 01:22 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 11:41 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-17-2013, 12:11 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-17-2013, 02:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)