Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PPL338 Joint Venture
#14

(05-16-2013, 02:08 AM)Palm Wrote:

The "nine block" limit falls under the definition of a "Location".  The O&G Act states that a location cannot contain more than 9 blocks.  Then under Sec 37 in describing the PRL application process for someone with a PPL, it states:

(1) A licensee whose petroleum prospecting licence is in force in respect of the blocks that constitute a location may, within two years after the date on which the blocks were declared to be a location, or such further period as the Minister allows, make application to the Director for the grant of a petroleum retention licence in respect of such of the blocks as the licensee satisfies the Minister contain a gas field or a part of a gas field or, for the better administration of petroleum activities, should be included in a petroleum retention licence.

(2) A licensee may, during the term of a petroleum prospecting licence, make application to the Director for a petroleum retention licence in respect of any block or blocks within the licence area—

(a) that he satisfies the Minister contains or contain a gas field or part of a gas field, or, for the better administration of petroleum activities, should be included in a petroleum retention licence; and

(b) that do not at the time of making the application constitute a location."

So I believe they would not be limited to the 9 blocks per (2).  It would be interesting to know which blocks make up those included in the "Location" granted to Tri/Bwata.

The nine blocks in the location would include all of the blocks that touch the block that the discovery was made.  If you draw a square on a piece of paper. You can see that there are eight squares that would touch the square where the discovery was made, making a total of nine.

The maximum number of blocks to be included in a location is nine. The maximum number of blocks for a PRL is only limited by the size of the PPL and what you can prove to the Mininser that contain gas or is needed for your operation. My opinion.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
PPL338 Joint Venture - by tarulestheday - 05-15-2013, 04:28 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 04:51 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:12 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by davidhmtk - 05-15-2013, 04:56 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-15-2013, 05:20 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:21 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:26 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-15-2013, 05:29 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-15-2013, 07:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Spartina - 05-15-2013, 06:48 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 01:31 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:08 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:16 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 02:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:44 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:50 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 02:38 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 08:27 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:04 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:39 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 05:37 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 05:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 07:00 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 12:50 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 09:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 09:47 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 01:22 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 11:41 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-17-2013, 12:11 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-17-2013, 02:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)