Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PPL338 Joint Venture
#27

Agree, but if Raptor is not to point of being able to convince DPE that it is worthy of being included in a PRL, these west prospects likely wouldn't be either.  This would support the language in the MD&A which states:

"On January 24, 2013, the DPE approved and registered the transfer of interest in PPL 237 to PRE and the related PRE JVOA. During the quarter, an application was submitted for a Petroleum
Retention License over the Triceratops discovery
."

In looking at PRL 15 it almost appears they shaped it as they did to be able to have access to the Hou and other offload area on the Purari.  It appears the Purari comes close enough to the Tri field to construct another offload area, so they might get away with less blocks.  If they end up piping product to EA to then the CSPs as they have shown on other slides, a PRL just "covering" Tri could be all they need.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
PPL338 Joint Venture - by tarulestheday - 05-15-2013, 04:28 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 04:51 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:12 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by davidhmtk - 05-15-2013, 04:56 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-15-2013, 05:20 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Movieguy - 05-15-2013, 05:21 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by TxPm - 05-15-2013, 05:26 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-15-2013, 05:29 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-15-2013, 07:17 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Spartina - 05-15-2013, 06:48 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 01:31 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:08 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:16 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 02:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:35 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:44 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 02:50 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 02:38 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 08:27 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 02:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:04 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 04:39 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 05:37 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 05:55 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 07:00 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-16-2013, 12:50 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Getitrt2 - 05-16-2013, 09:23 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 09:47 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by Palm - 05-16-2013, 01:22 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-16-2013, 11:41 PM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by petrengr1 - 05-17-2013, 12:11 AM
RE: PPL338 Joint Venture - by sageo - 05-17-2013, 02:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)