Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Petroleum Economist
#6

'Petro2458' pid='23703' dateline='<a href="tel:1370348 Wrote:

4 to 5 TCF!?  This is why stock is down...somehow very very low estimates are out there.

************

I agree.  It looks to me that the deal structure is changing because XOM is only willing to pay (maybe overpay) for the gas they feel they "know" is there, but is taking a conservative approach to spending money on anything related to gas beyond 5T.  That leaves IOC with the assets (the remainder of E/A and Tri) but also all of the risk.  This would mean delays to "prove up" the extra E/A gas (and then eventually the Tri gas) before being able to make staged deals.  On the other hand, if a full buyout is on XOM's radar...this comment (questioning the asset size) could be an intentional part of their negotiation strategy.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 09:24 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Tree - 06-04-2013, 09:39 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Petro2458 - 06-04-2013, 10:27 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by j4j - 06-04-2013, 10:37 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-04-2013, 10:49 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 10:39 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-05-2013, 02:08 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by ArtM72 - 06-04-2013, 11:02 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 11:05 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by ellerslick - 06-04-2013, 11:10 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by sageo - 06-04-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 02:29 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-05-2013, 02:38 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by admin - 06-05-2013, 02:34 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 02:39 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by tarulestheday - 06-05-2013, 03:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)